Energy and Environment Reporting for Texas

Drink Up: New Bill Would Give You Cash Back For Empties

Getty Images

Under a new bill, bottles could soon be refundable.

Finishing a six-pack could soon become a more profitable endeavor.

A bill introduced to the House, HB 1473 by Rep. Eddie Rodriguez, D-Austin, HB-calls for cash incentives for recycling many beverage containers. State Senator Rodney Ellis has also introduced the same bill into the senate.

The bill would require many beverage containers to be refundable, for five or 10 cents each. The money refunded would come from a deposit paid for when the beverages are purchased. A similar “bottle bill” was introduced to the legislature in 2011, but didn’t pass.

The Texas League of Conservation Voters (TLCV) commissioned a report on how the deposit-recycling program could affect the state economy. It says that if the program is implemented, the state could gain 2,300 jobs and reduce beverage container litter by 80 percent.

“This study demonstrates a beverage container deposit program is a job creator that will have a dramatic impact on economic development and substantially increase recycling in Texas,” Rep. Rodriguez said in a statement.

“We think it could be a real win-win,” David Weinberg, the executive director of the TLCV says. “It would increase jobs and recycling and reduce litter.”

The bills focus on the potential environmental improvements caused by the program, saying it would improve water quality and reduce pollution.

Weinberg remains optimistic about the bill’s potential impact, but realistic about its future.

“It would be difficult to get it passed at this point in time in Texas,” he says.

In the past, beverage producers and distributers have opposed deposit-recycling legislation.

Currently, ten states have container-deposit refund systems.

If all of this is making you thirsty, you may want to check out some other bills filed this session that aim to help smaller Texas brewers sell and market their wares.

Olivia Gordon is a reporting intern with StateImpact Texas.


  • Tualatin

    I didn’t know that any US states still resisted passing a beverage container bill. My home state of Oregon passed one in 1971. The law is credited with reducing litter and increasing container recycling. As a result, items that used to make up 40% of roadside litter have dropped to 6%. Return rates average about 90%.

  • my two cents

    Yeah as usual the big beverage are against it. It’s the reason most countries don’t have them. Thanks a lot coke.

  • LT

    Bottle deposit bills work. Period. http://www.bottlebill.org/legislation/usa/michigan.htm
    As a native Michigander, I’m still not accustomed to the Texas way of throwing away cans & bottles. They still look like dimes to me.

  • geighter eighter

    No! no, no, no, no, no, no.
    Absolutely NO to the Bottle Bill(s) in Texas.
    I am a traveler and I’ve been in Oregon and California and Michigan, and yeah they collect container deposits and then make you to have to go find some place to get your money back. BS! That is nothing short of another TAX.
    Back in the day, in Texas, when you could take bottles back to any store and redeem deposits – that was great.
    Nowadays, you’ve got salvage centers you can take aluminum cans to or you can set your recyclables out in recycle bins. That’s fine and it works well.
    Granted there isn’t as much demand for recycling plastic or glass bottles because of the associated costs. It cost too much to recycle and it pays too little to make the effort worthwhile.
    I am stating that people would be more supportive of getting more containers off the roadside if it were to become more practical to make that effort to deposit those recyclable items in places where folks could more easily collect them and then take them to the salvage centers when they have accumulated enough to make the trip worth their effort to earn a fair return for their time, energy and efforts.
    Otherwise, you folks are supporting nothing more than another TAX on everybody.
    Everybody who has to pay those deposit amounts, and too, everybody who has to employ all the efforts to implement all of the policies that will inevitably be drafted to make it as burdensome as possible on Texans. That is the only way bureaucratic intervention will ever work – work folks up with an emotional feel-good idea to help save some pet agenda and then make it as burdensome as possible to derive any benefit to anyone except for those enforcing their money-making schemes.
    Vote NO! Emphatically!

    • Sabs

      Could you elaborate? The new proposed law will allow you to get your deposit back.

      • geighter eighter

        Sabs, after re-reading my own posting which you queried for elaboration, I fail to understand your confusion. Since I do not require a payment or deposit from readers, how do you feel about consuming a product and then disregard without interest, with its intent to inform the consumer, other than to solicit a return from which you fail to show A or Any vested interest.

        Now, if I were a business and you approached with a container that allowed for a deposit return and I refused to give that amount or accept your container for a claim which you are making, then how much effort are you going to expend for what amount of return? At what point are you going to choose to pursue other efforts which will afford greater returns for your efforts?

        Add to the above, that if a law were passed that required payments for the costs of returning a product which would make enforcement more burdensome than any reasonable return would afford for the efforts, then how much time and or effort and or costs are you willing to expend for yourself, all the while never minding how the effects upon the rest of the community will be accrued without any of your awareness?

    • Curtis Johnson

      Your not very bright. If you buy a 6 pack with a bottle deposit of 5 cents it is 30 cents then you return all six empties you get 30 cents back it is not a tax at all. These deposits work to eliminate little and this is definitely needed in Texas more than many other places I have seen. Texas does need to change the bill though and force retailers to accept returns which makes it much more convenient for consumers when Walmart and all the grocery stores are forced to accept them rather than just redemption centers which work, but the locations usually suck.
      Next time you want to express your opinion at least have some knowledge of what you are talking about.

About StateImpact

StateImpact seeks to inform and engage local communities with broadcast and online news focused on how state government decisions affect your lives.
Learn More »