Texas

Energy and Environment Reporting for Texas

Yearly Archives: 2013

A Changing Market and Dim Future for Coal in Texas

A stream of workers leave the TXU Monticello power plant near Mt. Pleasant, Texas February 26, 2007.

Photo by REUTERS/Mike Stone /Landov

A stream of workers leave the TXU Monticello power plant near Mt. Pleasant, Texas February 26, 2007.

Amid the continued decline in coal power in the state, Texas’ largest power generator is asking the state for permission to idle another of its coal power units this winter. And new federal regulations proposed today make it unlikely that many new coal power plants will be built in the foreseeable future.

Luminant, a division of the financially-troubled Energy Future Holdings, is asking operators of the Texas grid if it can suspend one unit at its Martin Lake coal plant in Northeast Texas. It’s similar to another request by the company — already granted last year and again this year — to suspend two other units at the large Monticello coal power plant in the same region.

While there’s been plenty of talk over the last few years of a regulatory “War on Coal,” the culprit behind coal’s slowdown in Texas is something far different: the free market. Continue Reading

The Father of Environmental Justice Sees Danger in How Texas Regulates

As oil and gas production and processing increases, who wins and who loses in Texas?

Dave Fehling / StateImpact

As oil and gas production and processing increases, who wins and who loses in Texas?

Texas Land Commission Jerry Patterson told a political luncheon in Houston that “oppressive federal government regulation” was a big threat to the Texas energy economy. Especially pollution regulation by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

“And more specifically, (by) the U.S. Wildlife Service and their Endangered Species designations for critters that probably ought to die anyway,” Patterson said, referring to federal efforts to protect species including salamanders, lizards and prairie chickens. The designations could restrict oil & gas drilling in West Texas.

Come to Texas

It’s an anti-regulation stance repeated by the state’s top officials including Governor Rick Perry. Perry has used radio ads to try to lure businesses from other states to Texas where he said there is “limited government” and a “pro-business environment.”

Continue Reading

One Downside of Oil Drilling? Wasted Gas

Flaring gas at well site in DeWitt County

Flaring gas at well site in DeWitt County

As the fracking drilling boom continues in Texas and other states, a shift has taken place. While the beginning of the surge saw a rush for natural gas, in recent years the focus has moved to oil. And in the process, a lot of natural gas is being wasted. Billions of dollars worth, enough to power an entire nation.

When an oil well is drilled, it can also produce methane. But in drilling areas like the Eagle Ford Shale in Texas and the Bakken Shale in North Dakota, methane isn’t what drillers are after. One option is to simply vent it, releasing it directly into the atmosphere. Another is to “flare” it, combusting the methane instead. There’s enough flaring and drilling going on that you can see it from space.

“Flaring is infinitely more preferable than just venting those emissions into the atmosphere,” Drew Nelson, Manager of Special Projects for the Environmental Defense Fund, says. “Methane is much potent than carbon dioxide.” If methane were released directly in the air, it would have a much more detrimental climate effect. By burning the methane, it converts to carbon dioxide. “Which is still a greenhouse gas,” Nelson says, “but one molecule of methane is anywhere from 24 to a hundred times more potent than one molecule of carbon dioxide, depending on the time frame you’re looking at.”

But why not just collect and sell the gas? Continue Reading

Take a Look at Climate Change In Your Backyard

NASA data contrasts average Spring temperatures for the 1950s and 2090s.

Image by NASA

NASA data contrasts average Spring temperatures for the 1950s and 2090s.

There’s no shortage of maps or data sets that show the long-term climatic effects of rising temperatures. But what about a map showing the temperature of your block in 2087?

You could find that in newly released temperature projections from NASA. Using information from historical measurements, local geography, and greenhouse gas statistics, the maps derived from the data display the most localized climate change picture to date.

Up to this point, the smallest scale for a climate change model has been 100 kilometers. But NASA’s new data zooms in to project changes at a much higher resolution. The result is a data set that localizes climate change to the scale of 800 meters, around the size of a neighborhood.

Continue Reading

Lack of Floodplain Maps Could Leave Rural Texas Unprepared for Next Big Storm

David Maidment says many rural parts of Texas lack proper floodplain maps.

Photo by Mose Buchele

David Maidment says many rural parts of Texas lack proper floodplain maps.

Floods have devastated parts of Colorado and both the Gulf and Pacific Coasts of Mexico in the last week. While Texas had some rainfall during that time, it’s been years since the state has seen weather comparable to those disasters.

But that doesn’t mean that extreme stormy weather is gone for good.

“We know it’s coming, we just don’t know when,”  Roy Sedwick, the Executive Director of the Texas Floodplain Management Association, told StateImpact Texas.

That’s the reason for mapping floodplains, so that when the rains do come, people will be ready.

“Think of a floodplain as a railroad track,” explained Sedwick. “Just like the track is put down to carry the train, a floodplain is put down by mother nature to carry the flood waters.”

“The only difference is we know the schedule of the train, we don’t know the schedule of the flood,” he added.

Continue Reading

How Much Methane is Leaking From Gas Drilling? New Study Aims to Answer

A Cabot Oil and Gas natural gas drill is viewed at a hydraulic fracturing site on January 17, 2012 in Springville, Pennsylvania. A domestic drilling boom has led to concern that more methane is leaking into the atmosphere.

Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images

A Cabot Oil and Gas natural gas drill is viewed at a hydraulic fracturing site on January 17, 2012 in Springville, Pennsylvania. A domestic drilling boom has led to concern that more methane is leaking into the atmosphere.

A new study of natural gas drilling sites out today offers mixed results on methane leakage during the drilling and production process, one issue in an ongoing debate over the safety and risks involved with a new surge in domestic drilling.

Since domestic drilling for oil and natural gas has taken off with the help of techniques like fracking and horizontal drilling, a constant question has been how much methane (aka natural gas) is leaking into the atmosphere during the process. Methane is a potent greenhouse gas, says Drew Nelson with the Environmental Defense Fund, who helped coordinate the study. “For every molecule of methane that is emitted into the atmosphere, that molecule has the potential to undermine and erode the benefits of natural gas compared to other fossil fuels,” Nelson says.

Increased supplies of natural gas mean less coal (which has nearly twice the greenhouse impact of gas) is being burned in the country. But if too much methane is leaking, those climate gains could be lost.

The study, authored by David Allen of the University of Texas at Austin, is unique in its methodology. While previous studies have relied on estimates or downwind measurements, Allen’s team is the first to monitor emissions at nearly 200 drilling sites across the country directly for a year and a half. Previous studies of methane leakage had found varying rates, some as high as 8 percent. But Allen says direct access to the drilling sites themselves provided researchers with more accurate measurements. Continue Reading

A New Boom for Oil, but a Bust for State’s Rural Roads

Attendees filled the Alexander Convention Center on Tuesday evening for a Texas Department of Transportation hearing in Cotulla, TX on their controversial plan to convert some paved roads to gravel to save money on maintenance.

Photo by Eddie Seal/Texas Tribune

Attendees filled the Alexander Convention Center on Tuesday evening for a Texas Department of Transportation hearing in Cotulla, TX on their controversial plan to convert some paved roads to gravel to save money on maintenance.

From the Texas Tribune: 

COTULLA — At a convention center in this city 70 miles north of the U.S.-Mexico border, Dimmit County Judge Francisco Ponce said this week what many of the 200 people in the room were thinking.

Texas Department of Transportation officials explained why the agency needed to move forward with plans to convert some well-used paved roads around South Texas to gravel. For Ponce, the explanation exposed a long-standing problem in the agency’s perspective.

“TxDOT’s priorities are not in the rural counties,” he told the agency’s leadership, drawing cheers. “I don’t know how they can sit here and say it’s safer to gravel a road than it is to fix a road.”

Amid financing challenges, TxDOT announced seven weeks ago that it planned to convert 83 miles of farm-to-market road in the heart of the oil-drilling boom to gravel, most of that in the Eagle Ford Shale. Following a public outcry, the agency issued a 60-day moratorium on converting any roads. That has turned the end of October into a grim deadline for county officials hoping to find a way off the so-called gravel list. And as they consider options that include taking over the maintenance of the roads or soliciting donations from the energy sector, the officials say they are being punished for their region’s boom. Continue Reading

Restoring Power: What Houston Learned From Ike

Power pole in Houston equipped with antenna to allow remotely controlled switching

Dave Fehling / StateImpact

Power pole in Houston with antenna and equipment to allow remotely controlled switching

In the five years since Hurricane Ike knocked out power in most of metropolitan Houston, the city now has more high-tech power poles and fewer trees in power line rights-of-way. But there’s no real assurance of a better outcome the next time a big storm hits.

“If you get another direct hit from a large category hurricane such as Ike, you will probably still have the same amount of people impacted,” said David Baker, CenterPoint Energy’s Vice President in charge of 50,000 miles of wires and poles. “But we’ve tried to apply lessons learned from Ike to speed the recovery up and make that go faster.”

Hurricane Ike was a strong Category 2 storm when it made landfall in Galveston, leaving 95 percent of CenterPoint’s 2.26 million customers in the dark. Ten days later, 75 percent of them had power restored. It would take a week longer to get to everyone else.

Dominic Krus was among them. After two and a half weeks, the lights came back on in his home in Houston’s Sharpstown subdivision.

“My wife says the lights are on. I said, ‘Oh great, we can sleep with AC tonight.’ It was a pretty happy event,” said Krus. Continue Reading

As Drought Continues, Texas Reservoirs Could Hit All-Time Lows

An old windmill at Monahans Sand Hills State Park.

Photo by Mose Buchele/StateImpact Texas

An old windmill at Monahans Sand Hills State Park.

Texas is still in a drought, and it’s to the point where reservoir levels in the state may soon reach an all-time collective low.

“If they keep going down at the present rate, it will only take about two more weeks before they will set an all-time record for the difference between how much water they were designed to hold and how much they water they actually have in them,” state climatologist John Nielsen-Gammon tells Texas A&M Agrilife this week. “We continue to set records levels for this time of year, but this will be an all-time record low.”

While the state has seen some good rains since the long, dry summer of 2011, they haven’t been enough to fill many reservoirs back up. The state’s reservoirs are currently less than 60 percent full, according to the Texas Water Development Board.

Continue Reading

Why Tesla Lost the Fight to Sell Cars in Texas

The Tesla S at the company's showroom in Austin.

Photo by Olivia Gordon/StateImpact Texas

The Tesla S at the company's showroom in Austin.

It’s the shiniest electric car on the block — if your block is accustomed to cars that can cost six figures. The Tesla S, selected as Motor Trend’s Car of the Year, seems to be showing up on more and more Texas roads. The company had its first profitable quarter this year and paid off its federal loans.

But you can’t buy a Tesla in Texas from the dealership. You can’t even take it for a test drive. If you want to buy a Tesla in Texas, you have to order it online. (But once you do, you’ll find more and more Tesla charging stations to get you across the state.)

That’s because of state law (similar to those in many other states) that protects the franchise dealership system. Essentially, car manufacturers are not allowed to run and own dealerships. Tesla operates all of its own dealerships, however, and runs a different business model than traditional automakers and dealerships. It argued before the state legislature this past session that it deserved an exception to the rule: the state should allow it to have its own direct dealerships in Texas.

The legislation went nowhere, with lawmakers never even taking a vote. And a new report by the watchdog group Texans for Public Justice tells us why: it likely comes down to money. Continue Reading

About StateImpact

StateImpact seeks to inform and engage local communities with broadcast and online news focused on how state government decisions affect your lives.
Learn More »

Economy
Education