"Calling the balls and strikes" -- the Public Utility Commission
If it comes into your house in a wire or a pipe, chances are the Public Utility Commission regulates it.
The five-member panel oversees Pennsylvania’s gas, electric, water and wastewater utilities. It also regulates telephone providers. According to its website, the PUC oversees more than 6,000 different utilities, approving rates, service plans and safety issues.
On the natural gas front, the commission oversees Pennsylvania’s gas pipelines and “regulates natural gas distribution company rates and service, investigates gas cost rates, and encourages the development of competitive supply markets.”
The natural gas impact fee signed into law in February 2012 empowers the PUC to oversee and collect Marcellus Shale impact fee revenue.
The law also gave the commission power to decide whether or not municipal drilling regulation and zoning is “reasonable,” and within the standards of the statewide standards laid out by the law. At the time, Senate President Pro Tem Joe Scarnati, who shaped the majority of the impact fee, said he envisioned the commission serving as an umpire, “calling the balls and strikes” of whether local regulations fit within the law’s framework. However, in July 2014, the state Commonwealth Court stripped the agency of that authority. The PUC appealed the decision but ultimately lost.
The commission’s members are appointed by the governor and approved by the Senate. They serve five-year terms. Current members:
- Gladys Brown: appointed by Corbett in 2013; appointed chair by Governor Wolf in 2015
- Robert Powelson: appointed by Rendell in 2008; reappointed by Corbett in 2014
- John Coleman: appointed by Rendell in 2010; reappointed by Corbett in 2012
- Andrew Place: appointed by Wolf in 2015
- David Sweet: appointed by Wolf in 2016
Mapping data and Sunoco’s statements point to a 12-inch pipeline that would allow the company to fulfill customers’ orders for natural gas liquids while construction of the long-delayed Mariner East 2 pipeline is being completed.
Sunoco has said the project is nearly finished. Demonstrators said the project’s violations — and the fact that the line was recently struck by a contractor — are reasons to shut it down.
An administrative law judge said the project poses “an imminent risk to the public,” and more study is needed before construction can resume. Sunoco’s parent company ripped the decision as “a significant departure from the law.”