Lisa Sparks conducts offender screenings for Human Skills and Resources in Claremore.
Quinton Chandler / StateImpact Oklahoma
Lisa Sparks conducts offender screenings for Human Skills and Resources in Claremore.
Quinton Chandler / StateImpact Oklahoma
Itâs impossible to predict who will commit a crime in the future, but clinicians at a program funded by the Oklahoma Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services think itâs possible to make an educated guess at whoâs a higher risk.Â
The agency is expanding a program officials say helps courts match people with appropriate punishments for their circumstances. Increasing the number of these defendant screenings will connect more Oklahomans with care and assistance, which agency spokesperson Jeff Dismukes said will mean fewer people are sentenced to overcrowded prisons
The agency currently pays 22 outside treatment providers to size up people accused of felonies and recommend ways to keep them on the right side of the law. Human Skills and Resources, a nonprofit in Tulsa, Creek and Rogers counties is one of them.Â
Lisa Sparks, a clinician with the nonprofit, screens people for Rogers County District Court.
âNormally we get a referral from someone,â she said. âWhether itâs the court, or their attorney (or) the district attorneyâs office â that triggers us to know that the person needs one done.âÂ
The screenings typically come after a defendant is arrested and charged but before a judge has ruled. Sparks said the process focuses on three things: Mental health needs, addiction and other life circumstances that put people at risk higher risk of committing crimes.
The Legislature tasked the agency with screening people facing felonies in 2012. So far, the program has screened more than 26,000 people in 37 counties.Â
Lawmakers gave the agency an additional $4 million this year to expand the program to every county. Screeners like Sparks will soon give all district courts recommendations on local defendants facing charges.
Sparks hopes her reports and recommendations help judges and attorneys consider how they can help defendants repair their lives.
Most defendants who are screened are released into court-ordered supervision and possibly treatment, according to agency officials who said courts that use the screening see fewer prison sentences for nonviolent felonies. They said some counties that have the program reduced the number of days people spend in jail. In Pontotoc County, the screenings are also credited with reducing the amount of time defendants have to wait to get into drug court.
After screenings, Sparks recommends follow-up evaluations for people struggling with serious mental health conditions, and suggests outpatient treatment for people with drug or alcohol addiction.Â
There are other risk factors Sparks highlights for the court.Â
âMaybe they didnât finish school, theyâre not employed, they donât have a lot of family or social support,â Sparks said.Â
In those cases, clinicians might recommend ways to help defendants fill those gaps, but Sparks said theyâre just suggestions to help courts make decisions.Â
Without the screenings, Sparks thinks defendants wouldnât get the best possible treatment options because courts wouldnât know their individual histories.
Judges in Rogers and Creek Counties donât completely agree on the value of the defendant screenings. One judge is a big fan and thinks they should be used more often. Another said the screenings arenât always reliable, but said more information is always better.
Rachel Chandler of Beggs has struggled with a painkiller addiction that started after she broke her back as a teenager. She was arrested in 2013 on four felony drug charges and received probation. She had to take drug tests regularly.
âI had failed all the time,â she said. âThey gave me many chances.âÂ
Chandler avoided prison after a screening with Human Skills and Resources. Staff recommended drug court, which had stricter rules but more treatment options than her probation program.
Chandler messed up in drug court, too. She tested positive for drugs multiple times and didnât follow the rules. But, Chandler says the report from her screening and her drug court administratorâs willingness to give her one last chance carried a lot of weight with the district attorneyâs office.
Chandler remembered the warning from the district attorney: âHe said, âDonât screw this up. Iâm going out on a limb for you.â Because everybody else thought I should go to prison.â
That time Chandler didnât screw up. She followed the rules and graduated drug court. Now, sheâs about to start unsupervised probation and sheâs living a stable life with her fiancĂ©, her 3-year-old son and two stepkids.
âThat one more chance ⊠saved me,â Chandler said.