Rick Santorum Loves Fracking and Drilling, Hates Federal Regulation

Tom Pennington / Getty Images

The Republican presidential hopeful was in Oklahoma City yesterday and spoke to about 1,200 mostly conservative audience members at a crowded hotel convention center.

The former two-term Republican U.S. senator from Pennsylvania told the crowd that hydraulic fracturing — which has been used in Oklahoma, Texas and Kansas for since the 1950s — is “the new boogeyman,” The Oklahoman reports.

Santorum said environmental concerns are unfounded about the method of water, sand and some chemical additives being pumped into the well at high pressure to free gas from the rock, the paper reports.

Santorum’s backing of hydraulic fracturing pleased the crowd, Michael McNutt reports, as did his support of “limited government.”

Oklahoma, he said, is “ground zero of the conservative movement.”

“In Oklahoma you do it the right way,” he said. “You believe in liberty, you believe in private enterprise and free economy. You believe in limited government. You believe in a foundation of our society based on faith and family. You understand that without strong families, you can’t have a strong economy, the paper reports.

Santorum — fresh off primary victories in Minnesota, Missouri and Colorado — said he opposed regulating the oil and natural gas industry. He said President Barack Obama was trying to “crush” domestic energy production, and voiced support deep offshore drilling and drilling in Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, The Oklahoma reports.

Santorum also campaigned at Oral Roberts University in Tulsa on Thursday. Oklahoma has 43 Republican delegates, and Santorum said he’d return to the Sooner State before its Super Tuesday presidential primary on March 6.

Comments

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Beth-Cooper/100001410645787 Beth Cooper

    Rick Santorum doesn’t know what he’s talking about re hydraulic fracturing. I live in PA and have 3 wells near me. This is a dangerous, toxic industry, that recently railroaded through a bill in PA – HB 1950 – that allows drilling, open pits of toxic waste, compressor stations (which push the gas through the pipelines and spew large amounts of fumes containing carcinogenic and neurotoxic chemicals), and other related installations in all zones, INCLUDING RESIDENTIAL ZONES. They’re also making it illegal for doctors to reveal chemicals that someone sick with gas drilling-related chemical exposure has been exposed to. This means that an entire community being exposed to the same chemicals will not be able to be warned.

    Even without this, I wouldn’t support Santorum if I were you. We lived with him here in PA and trust me – he’s not the brightest candle on the cake.

  • Jet Miskis

    Mr. Santorum, you need to tour the private property owners in Washington County Pennsylvania so you can speak to the people who are forced to live around “Unconventional High Pressure Slick Water Hydraulic Fracking.” Around 75% of Washington County residents have well water. Ask these people Mr. Santorum…ask them if they have a water buffalo, ask them what they think about this invasive industry. Now ask those people, who signed leases, “What do you think about the passage of Pennsylvania House Bill 1950 (which our Gov. Corbett is soon to sign off on); especially since these people were lead to believe that their local ordinances were going to protect them?” So much for the rules of the game! What happened to the supreme court rulings that gave municipalities their due marginal powers? Local municipalities are stunned; all of their work (some communities spending over 2 years working on an ordinance) is now going to be thrown out. I feel positive if each lease signer knew that they were going to do this they would not have signed their lease. Here’s what our legislature and Governor Corbett are saying to all those who signed leases, “Too bad, you signed a lease, but we changed the rules of the game….and NO, you can’t get out of your lease, even though we changed the rules after you signed it.”
    There must be a legal challenge to Pennsylvania House Bill 1950?

  • JMG

    To listen to previous comments, one could come away with the impression that Washington County specifically and southwestern PA in general were the the untainted forest primevil until the gas drilling began.

    In truth, you would not have to travel very far around the area to note large standing slate / slag dumps, and other scars left by the long-existant coal industry. It would be naive to think that, despite the dumps, mine sinkage, strip-mining, and methane seepage that has occurred here over generations, all was pristine until the gas drillers moved in. Few seem to want to admit the possibilty that much of the well water in the area was already polluted to one degree or another even before the gas drilling ever began. In fact, engineers with one company actually reported that in their pre-drill water testing, they found that 50% of the aquifer water they sampled was already polluted. In at least some cases, the gas drillers may simply be guilty of being the messenger who bears the bad news.

    This is not to say that an anything goes attitude toward the gas drillers or anyone else is justified, but we should beware that alarmists do not push us all to throw out the baby with the bath water.

  • Gaylebingaman

    I am amazed at the number of people that support fracking. How can anyone who cares about our children not be concerned about their future? We get EVERYTHING from the earth, the same earth we put toxins into. . I don’t know how ANYONE can say it is safe!!! Do what is right for the future of our children, not our pockets today.

About StateImpact

StateImpact seeks to inform and engage local communities with broadcast and online news focused on how state government decisions affect your lives.
Learn More »

Education