Pennsylvania

Energy. Environment. Economy.

Cancer causing air toxins detected at frack sites

A compressor station pumps natural gas into the Tennessee Pipeline in Dimock, Pa.

Katie Colaneri/StateImpact Pennsylvania

A compressor station pumps natural gas into the Tennessee Pipeline in Dimock, Pa.

A peer reviewed study published Thursday in the journal Environmental Health reveals dangerous levels of air toxins near fracking operations. The carcinogen formaldehyde was the most common chemical found to exceed federal safety levels, according to Denny Larson, one of the report’s authors. Larson works with the nonprofit Global Community Monitor.

“The number of [chemicals] that we found near these sites are alarming,” said Larson in a call with reporters. “They are, as the title of our report clearly says, a warning sign.”

The deadly chemical hydrogen sulfide was also found in high levels in Wyoming samples. Hydrogen sulfide is known to kill oil field workers. A recent report by EnergyWire documents the dangers to shale oil production workers from air toxins.

Volunteers in six states, including Pennsylvania, took air samples for the study. Pennsylvania’s samples show high levels of formaldehyde near compressor stations. The research was led by David Carpenter, a physician and director of the Institute for Health and the Environment at New York State University at Albany. Carpenter says he’s most concerned about the high levels of benzene and formaldehyde measured by the volunteers.

“One thing about cancer is that it doesn’t happen tomorrow after exposure,” said Carpenter. “Cancer ususally takes at least five, but more often 10, 20 or even 30 years to develop. So our concern is that these carcinogens that were monitored near homes, near schools, near farms with animals, the people that are exposed are going to be at risk of developing cancer. But it will only appear in the future.”

He says the formaldehyde is formed in two ways. One by combustion at compressor stations, but also as a byproduct of methane leaks, when exposed to the sun.

Rebecca Roter, with Breathe Easy Susquehanna County, participated in the study as a volunteer. Roter says she lives less than a mile from a compressor station and says her health has deteriorated as a result. Roter emphasized the importance of data collection.

“Getting the data is key because it gives us the teeth to try and change the dialog,” said Roter.

“We’re hoping that getting data like what was generated in this project will get the attention of our community officials and legislators and drive the dialog so we can limit our chemical exposure.”

Evidence for air toxins emitted by natural gas drilling activity is mixed, which could be a result of the difficulty surrounding the collection of data. Air quality is impacted by many variables including the weather, the stage of gas development, and the type of industrial activity. Researchers say it’s also difficult to quantify the public health impacts.

A 2010 air monitoring study by the Department of the Environment Protection did not find dangerous levels of air toxins at frack sites. And an industry group is questioning the methodology used in this most recent report. Katie Brown from Energy In Depth says the “bucket method” used by the volunteers described in a 2001 EPA memo has flaws. Brown writes that the methods raise “huge red flags.” And she questions the politics of the volunteers, many of whom belong to groups that oppose gas drilling. Brown says better air monitoring methods exist, but could not describe those in detail.

The study received funding from the V. Kann Rasmussen Foundation, the Center for Health, Science, and Public Policy, and the Institute for Health and the Environment.

Comments

  • Rebecca Roter

    the buckets are similar to a summa grab sample, suitable for voc analysis by certified EPA labs but not for formaldehyde analysis. Passive badges were used for formaldehyde and analysed by certified EPA labs.

  • JimBarth

    Susan Phillips refers to a 2010 air study performed by PA DEP, without mentioning that the several air studies performed by PA DEP have recently been exposed to have presented wildly incomplete, and more importantly, erroneous results and conclusions. This was made clear by information gathered during the discovery phase of a lawsuit in Pennsylvania.
    It seems quite unacceptable to me that Ms. Phillips would write that the DEP air monitoring study found no dangerous levels of air toxins at “frack sites”, without mentioning the recent information that discredits those studies. To make matters worse, Ms. Phillips immediately followed this with a quote by an Energy in Depth spokesperson making a statement that attempts to undermine the credibility of this new, peer reviewed study, that is damaging to the industry’s propaganda machine.
    What is going on here?

  • Victoria Switzer

    Every time we have a “blow off” scheduled or emergency we are getting dosed? The roaring from the nearest compressor is not just an inconvenience. This is all part of being the necessary sacrifice. Wealth for a few at the expense of our health. Just the American way….just the way of the gas industry and its loyal disciples.

About StateImpact

StateImpact seeks to inform and engage local communities with broadcast and online news focused on how state government decisions affect your lives.
Learn More »

Economy
Education