Pennsylvania

Energy. Environment. Economy.

DEP Says Marcellus Air Emissions Data Show Small Footprint

Getty Images

Trucks carry fluid from a natural gas drilling site in Susquehanna County.

The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Secretary Michael Krancer says air emissions associated with Marcellus Shale production are a “small fraction of air pollution in the state.” The DEP announced the release of air emissions data collected in 2011. In the announcement, Secretary Krancer stressed that air emissions in the state have dropped since drilling began in earnest back in 2008.

“It is worth noting that annual sulfur dioxide emissions are down more than half a million tons per year from where they were in 2008,” Krancer said in a press release. “This is a direct result of air quality regulations and the increased use of natural gas in the power generation sector.”

DEP says studies of air emissions associated with natural gas drilling conducted in 2010 showed no danger of health impacts, nor did they rise above the federal ambient air quality standards for carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide and ozone.
But a study released last month by the Rand Corporation says potential environmental and health related costs of Marcellus air pollution ranged between $7.2 million and $32 million. The Report, “Estimation of regional air-quality damages from Marcellus Shale natural gas extraction in Pennsylvania,” also acknowledged that shale production air emissions were not the largest source of air pollution in the state. But, the Rand report says some regions could be significantly impacted by the activity.

“While statewide emissions from the extraction industry are relatively small compared to some other major sources of air pollution in the state (e.g., SO2 from GW-scale coal-fired power plants), these emissions sources are nevertheless a concern in regions of significant extraction activities. More detailed analyses, including regional data acquisition and consideration of site-specific variability, will be valuable in regions of intense extraction activity and for specific activities and pollutants shown in this analysis to be of most potential concern. And while significant uncertainty may exist for some potential risks of shale gas extraction, under current standard practices, shale gas extraction will be associated with non-trivial air pollution emissions.”

The Rand Corporation study looked at four sources of regional air pollutants resulting from natural gas production. These include truck traffic, emissions from the well sites during drilling and hydraulic fracturing, the use of diesel engines, fugitive emissions from the wellhead, and emissions associated with the transport of gas via compressor stations.

 

Comments

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Vera-Scroggins/725945851 Vera Scroggins

    The DEP study of air emissions of gas sites was only a short-term study of about two days; it’s not a long-term study; it’s the usual DEP half-ass effort at testing and trying to calm fears. Don’t trust it.

    • TheProspector

      I don’t trust Krancer that much, but trust Vera Scroggins even less. Be very, very careful.

About StateImpact

StateImpact seeks to inform and engage local communities with broadcast and online news focused on how state government decisions affect your lives.
Learn More »

Economy
Education