Energy. Environment. Economy.

Court hears testimony on attempt to halt state forest drilling plan

The state Commonwealth Court heard testimony today on an effort to prevent the Corbett administration from opening up more public park and forest land to natural gas drilling.

As part of a larger lawsuit, the Pennsylvania Environmental Defense Foundation (PEDF) is seeking a preliminary injunction to halt additional leasing of public land and the transfer of $117 million from the state Oil and Gas Lease Fund for DCNR’s operating budget.

On Friday, Governor Corbett issued an executive order ending a four-year moratorium on oil and gas leasing of park and forest land in a effort to raise $75 million dollars for this year’s budget.

The administration has called the order a restrictive approach to expanding drilling. It allows companies to extract gas horizontally from wells located on adjacent private land or in areas of state forests where leases already exist.

“We learned very quickly this would be different”

Penn State University forestry professor James Grace was the first witness to testify on behalf of the PEDF.

Grace chairs the state Department of Conservation and Natural Resources (DCNR) natural gas advisory committee and served as its Bureau of Forestry director when the gas boom began during the Rendell administration.

At the time, Grace says the department only had experience will shallow, conventional gas extraction and didn’t know how to handle the size and scale of Marcellus Shale development.

“We learned very quickly this would be different from what we experienced in the past,” he said.

He praised the current efforts by DCNR to mitigate adverse impacts from drilling– in particular its recently published Marcellus monitoring report–but he says he doesn’t believe the state should engage in new leasing until the impacts of development are fully understood.

“I’m not opposed drilling for gas on state forest land,” he said. “It’s a question of scale.”

During cross-examination attorney Sean Concannon–who represents Governor Corbett–quizzed Grace on several of the gas leases he signed during his time at DCNR.

Concannon pointed to the extensive list of restrictions the department routinely places on gas companies– including the spacing and location of wellpads, plugging requirements, and land reclamation.

“This lease is intended to be as comprehensive as possible, correct?” said Concannon.

“I’m not going to argue the lease protocols aren’t the best they can be,” Grace replied. “I’m more concerned about the cumulative impacts. There have been accidents and mistakes.”

“The forest was being treated as a cash cow”

Former DCNR Secretary John Quigley testified next, and he did not mince words when it came to his former boss, Governor Ed Rendell.

“The state forest was being treated as a cash cow,” Quigely said of the leasing that took place under Rendell. “That was extraordinarily dangerous and presented an existential threat to the resource.”

He went on to say he was “shocked and angered” in 2009 when the legislature amended the state fiscal code to give the General Assembly control over how royalty money from the state’s Oil and Gas Lease Fund was spent. It had previously been managed by DCNR.

“It was taking away a significant source of revenue from the agency,” he said. “The governor and the General Assembly were coming very close to slaughtering the cash cow.”

Attorneys for Corbett and the Commonwealth did not have time this afternoon to cross-examine Quigely. PEDF is planning to call three more witnesses. The hearing is scheduled to resume on Monday and may continue into Tuesday.

Spokespeople for DCNR and the Governor’s Office of General Counsel both declined to comment on the case.





  • Pragmatism Wins

    Very disappointed to see Mr. Quigley (for whom I have a great deal of respect) putting politics ahead of policy on this issue. It was Democratic Governor Ed Rendell who leased over 130,000 acres of state forest lands. Governor Corbett, on the other hand, has leased exactly 0 acres of state forest land for surface development.

    Mr. Quigley usually has very pragmatic views, and understands the compromises we need to make. This is befuddling. How much more slanted in the favor of conversationalists can you get? Extracting the energy without ANY additional surface disturbance. Our state forests are in exceptional shape. They remain FSC certified as sustainably managed. You’d think Corbett issued an order to slash and burn the whole forest.

    As far as the funding, one Marcellus leasehold sale eclipsed the entire Oil & Gas Lease Fund revenues since its inception decades prior. DCNR should have sat on close to a billion dollars as we had to lay of teachers and shut down schools? I guess we can only use revenues from gas drilling to pay for schools and teachers if it’s taken directly from landowners and gas companies as a severance tax.

    • NorthernTier

      Given the choice, would you prefer to plug the budget hole by (1) leasing more DCNR land for gas development, or (2) (partial) privatization of the state’s liquor business? (Corbett is in favor of privatization; the hang-up is in the legislature,)

  • paulroden

    The industry’s record of drilling anywhere is abysmal. To say they won’t ruin park or state forests or water tables drilling outside and horizontally into, and under that land is ludicrous. Besides, the well flaring, pipeline and pump house construction and operation will pollute the air. And no one is monitoring or studying the public health impact of the radioactive radon in the gas. The radioactive half life of radon is 3.8 days. Nobody can sell or buy a house without testing and mitigating for radon. The uranium miners, homeowners who built homes on landfill or concrete made with uranium mill tailings paid the price of exposure to radon with higher levels of lung cancer. There is no safe exposure to radiation. The impact of radiation exposure is calmative. And no one seems to care about the impact of burning this natural gas on the climate. There are alternatives to extracting this gas. Visit Fracking is too dangerous, too expensive and totally unnecessary for our energy needs. Germany has reached 74% renewable energy and has a goal of getting off of all fossil fuel by 2050 and off of all nuclear power by 2022. If the Germans can do it, we can do it. All we lack is the political will because of the corrupting influence of the dirty energy industries on our governments. There are more of us then there are of them. When will the people rise up and tell our elected leaders to say no and transition to a renewable energy economy.

  • kenneth weir

    The swine’s(politicians and oil and gas) need to eat.!

  • Lisa DeSantis

    Cast pearls before the swine.

About StateImpact

StateImpact seeks to inform and engage local communities with broadcast and online news focused on how state government decisions affect your lives.
Learn More »