Energy. Environment. Economy.

Pike County Court Orders Protesters to Stay Away from Tennessee Pipeline

Jolie Defies

A court has ordered protesters to keep off the Tennessee Gas pipeline work site.

The Pocono Record reports the Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company successfully got an injunction in Pike County Court this week to keep protesters off of its work site:

Protesters are opposed to the construction of the company’s Northeast Upgrade Project, 40 miles of a natural gas pipeline, including 10.5 miles through Pike County.

The pipeline must be operational by Nov. 1 because the company has an agreement to provide gas capacity to two companies by then.

Some protesters have publicly stated their intention to slow or stop the project.

They became more active as the company cleared trees from its federally approved right-of-way, through mostly privately owned forest land, according to testimony Monday.

At least three protesters were arrested in Westfall for climbing and sitting in trees that were slated for clearing, causing the company to work around those sites.

In February, StateImpact covered two protesters who had handcuffed themselves to a gate in the Delaware State Forest for two days, in order to block access to tree felling crews:

The protests follow a series of failed legal efforts to halt the project. Environmental activists say the expanded pipeline will scar the landscape, and cause irreparable harm to sensitive watersheds. The upgrade project includes loops around existing pipelines, traveling through wooded forests and across wetlands.

“The result is runoff and more pollution,” says Maya van Rossum with the Delaware Riverkeeper Network, a grassroots environmental group formed 25 years ago to protect the Delaware watershed. “But also a greater volume of water will be coming into our streams and causing downstream erosion.”

Van Rossum says drilling in the Marcellus Shale has led to at least 14 new pipeline projects completed or planned for the Delaware River watershed.

“The cumulative effect is very dramatic,” she says. “The pipeline companies tend to target open spaces that we all fought so hard to protect.”


  • TheProspector

    “open spaces that we all fought so hard to protect.” Hah! These open spaces were protected by the generations of farmers and landowners who have owned this land in the upper Delaware since the 18th century, not by some Johnny-come-lately purported environmentalists. Van Rossum wants to keep her majestic views at the expense of those who actually pay taxes on the land and live in bucolic poverty. Her goal is to have this beauty available to rich folks and famous people who come from NYC periodically to enjoy the beauty and then go back to their comfy, gas heated co-ops.

    • susquehannock

      Well, I hope the farmers and landowners don’t mind watching their property values drop. Also, those pesky NYC rich folk and their (evidently unwanted) tourist dollars probably won’t be annoying you for too much longer. Chances are they won’t find the Pipeline all that attractive, and they’ll find other places to go. I hear Vermont is nice.

      • TheProspector

        I think you’ll find that the locals would rather have good jobs that are not dependant upon tourism — which are almost always minimum wage jobs. The property values card does not play in this area for several reasons — and they’re economic, not cultural reasons.

About StateImpact

StateImpact seeks to inform and engage local communities with broadcast and online news focused on how state government decisions affect your lives.
Learn More »