EXPLAINER | Sardis Lake
24 stories

Sardis Lake

Sardis Lake is at the heart of the dispute over who controls water across southeast Oklahoma

gmeador / Flickr

Sardis Lake is at the heart of the dispute over who controls water across southeast Oklahoma

The State of Oklahoma, the Choctaw and Chickasaw Nations and the City of Oklahoma City are in federal court, fighting over the rights to water in Sardis Lake. But while this fight centers on a small lake in southeastern Oklahoma, the outcome of the case could change how government controls the rights to Oklahoma’s most water-rich region.

Historic Claim

The State of Oklahoma has been allocating water rights for more than 100 years — since statehood. But that could change if the Choctaw and Chickasaw Nations are successful in a federal lawsuit that asserts their authority over water throughout southeast Oklahoma.

The tribes claim the water has belonged to them since before the Civil War.

The tribes base their claim on the 1830 Treaty of Dancing Rabbit Creek, which established the Choctaw Nation. Proponents of the tribes’ position say, along with the land, the Choctaws got the rights to the water in minerals in their territory as well.

While the Choctaw and Chickasaw Nations were never explicitly disbanded by law, the state says the tribes’ decision to side with the Confederacy during the Civil War — and later, statehood — had the same effect, and their rights to the water were lost in the process.

The Fight Today

The tribal lawsuit is on hold while the parties involved in the case negotiate outside of court. Oklahoma City is part of the suit as well. It was the city’s decision to move forward with a pipeline that would bring water from Sardis Lake, in southeast Oklahoma, to OKC that caused the Choctaws and Chickasaws to sue.

  • June 2010: Oklahoma Water Resources Board approves transfer of Sardis Lake storage rights to Oklahoma City.
  • August 2011: Choctaw and Chickasaw Nations sue to stop water from being taken out of historically tribal territory.
  • January 2012: Negotiations begins among the parties in the case after a federal judge puts the lawsuit on hold.

There’s no telling how long the talks will last, or who will end up controlling southeast Oklahoma’s water after the case is settled, which could take decades if states like Wyoming and New Mexico — where similar conflicts have arisen — are any indication.

Wyoming has been trying to work out tribal water rights in the Big Horn River Basin for 36 years. It took New Mexico more than four decades to determine Pueblo water rights there.

Latest stories


The People Stuck In the Middle Of the Fight Over Southeast Oklahoma’s Water

Sardis Lake, in southeastern Oklahoma, is at the heart of a battle between state and tribal governments over control of water.

By and

The View From Sardis Lake: Why Moving Water to Where It’s Needed is So Hard

Moving water from where it’s plentiful — in sparsely populated southeast Oklahoma — to where it’s needed seems like a logical way to meet everyone’s future water needs.

By


Why The OKC Coalition To Pump Water From Southeast Oklahoma Fell Apart

Oklahoma City has been pumping water out of southeast Oklahoma along the Atoka pipeline for 50 years.

By

OKC Steps Up Water Conservation Effort, Levying Fines and Giving Skeptics Hope

One of the biggest complaints StateImpact has heard from residents in Canton and southeast Oklahoma: Oklahoma City should conserve the water it has before taking it from them.

By

Government Shutdown Shutters Federal Parks and Campsites in Oklahoma

So no camping at Eufaula and Sardis Lakes, among many other recreation areas important to local economies.

By

The Fight Over Water in Southeastern Oklahoma Tied to Treaties, Tribes and Civil War

The parties have been negotiating outside of court since early 2012, and the case was stayed for a sixth time Sept. 17.

By


State, Tribal Water Negotiations “Moving in the Right Direction” With No End in Sight

Gov. Mary Fallin’s spokesman, Alex Weintz, told the AP “The governor is optimistic these negotiations are moving in the right direction and will result in a resolution that is fair to all Oklahomans.”

By

More posts