Oklahoma

Economy, Energy, Natural Resources: Policy to People

The OKC Thunder Has a Big Economic Impact, But It’s Hard to Say How Much

ROBYN BECK / AFP/GettyImages

Fans arrive for Game 2 of the NBA Finals at the Chesapeake Energy Arena in Oklahoma City.

The $89 million Chesapeake Arena was built with public money from a dedicated sales tax.

So did Oklahoma City get its tax money’s worth?

Yes, economists tell The Oklahoman‘s Don Mecoy — even if the impact is incalculable.

“We don’t have mountains. We don’t have a coastline. We don’t have a ski resort,” economist Mark Snead tells the paper. “Amenities include pro sports franchises. It’s one of those components that now make Oklahoma City completely in a different category.”

How do you put a price tag on a front-page Wall Street Journal story, or images of Oklahoma City’s skyline and throngs of local fans being beamed all over the world?

There are ways to estimate the real-world economic impact of sports teams, but it’s an imprecise science. OKC officials base their Thunder impact estimates on data collected during the New Orleans Hornets’ temporary stay in Oklahoma. Using that methodology, OKC is looking at more than $53 million in economic impact, Mecoy writes.

But before moving to OKC, the Seattle SuperSonics claimed a $234 million economic impact — “a huge difference from the Thunder estimates,” Mecoy notes.

Such studies often exaggerate the benefits, Robert Dauffenbach, director of the Center for Economic and Management Research at OU’s Price Business College tells The Oklahoman. Major sporting events often replace other entertainment spending and disrupt normal economic activity, which makes calculations even more difficult.

“The chief benefit is it puts you up there with the world-class kinds of cities. Frankly, we belong there with San Antonio and Seattle,” he tells the paper.

Dauffenbach’s sentiments echo those of Mickey Hepner, an economist and Dean of the University of Central Oklahoma’s College of Business Administration. In January — long before the OKC Thunder won the Western Conference title and made its way to the NBA finals — Hepner told a StateImpact audience that improving a state’s image is usually worth raising taxes for.

“It’s not usually about cutting taxes, it’s about enhancing the quality of life,” he said. “That should be the metric.”


StateImpact Oklahoma is a partnership among Oklahoma’s public radio stations and relies on contributions from readers and listeners to fulfill its mission of public service to Oklahoma and beyond. Donate online.

Comments

  • LoveOKC

    What is non incalculable is that the if the 5 wealthiest men in the state had brought the team without asking for a handout – OKC and OK would be 100′s of millions of dollars richer – we see the small smattering of charity but forget the huge subsides that are used for their ventures.

  • PaulOKC

    Ultimately, spending the same amount of money on something else, through taxes or personal spending, would have the same economic impact. On balance, the NBA is likely a worse investment since a huge amount of the spending goes out of town in player salaries and most of the other jobs that are “created” are part-time, seasonal, and minimum wage.

About StateImpact

StateImpact seeks to inform and engage local communities with broadcast and online news focused on how state government decisions affect your lives.
Learn More »

Economy
Education