Krancer (Once Again) Tells Washington To "Back Off"
-
Scott Detrow
Last month, StateImpact Pennsylvania detailed Department of Environmental Protection Secretary Michael Krancer’s adverse relationship with the federal government:
When the EPA began an invesÂtiÂgaÂtion of whether or not the water in Dimock, SusqueÂhanna County was safe to drink, Krancer essenÂtially told EPA AdminÂisÂtraÂtor Lisa JackÂson she didn’t know what she was talkÂing about.
“We realÂize and recÂogÂnize that EPA is very new to all of this and the EPA’s underÂstandÂing of the facts and sciÂence behind this activÂity is rudiÂmenÂtary,” he wrote. “ForÂtuÂnately, PennÂsylÂvaÂnia is not new to all of this and we have a long hisÂtory of expeÂriÂence at overÂseeÂing and regÂuÂlatÂing oil and natÂural gas extracÂtion activÂiÂties in our state, includÂing hydraulic fracturing.”
…SitÂting in his HarÂrisÂburg office, Krancer said the EPA doesn’t always trust the state’s judgÂment.  “It’s amazÂing to me someÂtimes how stuÂpid the EPA has disÂcovÂered we became as of JanÂuÂary 19, 2011,” he said, pointÂing to the date the RepubÂliÂcan CorÂbett AdminÂisÂtraÂtion took conÂtrol. “And I conÂtinue to say that. It is someÂwhat frusÂtratÂing because I do have 2,600 of the best experts on the planet…and I think someÂtimes my fedÂeral partÂners don’t recÂogÂnize that.”
Yesterday, Krancer took that message directly to Washington, telling a House committee the federal government needs to “back off” of drilling oversight, and let states take the lead.
At one point, Democrat Gerry Connolly compared Krancer’s states-first stance to the arguments segregated states made against federal integration efforts in the 1950s. Politico reported on the exchange:
A heated exchange unfolded after Krancer stated his initial position on the federal government’s role.
“I don’t think the issue is whether the federal government has a role [to regulate fracking],” Krancer said. “The issue is whether the federal government should have a pre-emptive role. It should not. … The question is a fundamental one: Are you in a better place in Washington to tell us what to do?”
Connolly responded: “Those are the same kinds of arguments that were used for generations. If we were talking 40 to 50 years ago about Jim Crow laws in the South and civil rights, we wouldn’t have heard testimony at this table.”
This is the second time in eight months that Krancer has testified before a House panel. His November appearance had confrontational moments, too, though Jim Crow laws were never references.
Here’s some video from yesterday’s House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform hearing, which, it’s worth pointing out, certainly had a loaded agenda. The hearing was titled “Rhetoric vs. Reality, Part II: Assessing the Impact of New Federal Red Tape on Hydraulic Fracturing and American Energy Independence”