Pennsylvania

Energy. Environment. Economy.

The DRBC’s Newly Proposed Natural Gas Regulations Explained

Mary Cum­mings Jor­dan / WHYY

View of the Delaware River from Bucks County, Pa.

Pennsylvania’s nat­ural gas drilling boom is expected to get rolling in North­east Penn­syl­va­nia after the Delaware River Basin Com­mis­sion votes on its pro­posed drilling reg­u­la­tions. Drilling in the Delaware River Basin has been under a mora­to­rium until the Com­mis­sion­ers approve new rules. After receiv­ing thou­sands of pub­lic com­ments, and hold­ing sev­eral pub­lic hear­ings, the DRBC has updated its Decem­ber 2010 pro­posal. We have a link to the anno­tated fact sheet below.

At the meet­ing on Novem­ber 21, Com­mis­sion­ers will vote on the pro­posed reg­u­la­tions, but will not take any fur­ther pub­lic com­ment. This has envi­ron­men­tal­ists plan­ning some poten­tial direct actions.

“We will legally exer­cise our First Amend­ment rights come Novem­ber 21,” said the head of the Delaware River­keeper Net­work, Maya von Rossum.

DRBC offi­cials say they’re fol­low­ing estab­lished pro­to­col when it comes to the issue over pub­lic com­ment peri­ods. But envi­ron­men­tal­ists like von Rossum have a lot to say about the new pro­pos­als. A coali­tion of nine groups released a ten-point cri­tique of the document.

First on the list of griev­ances is the set­back require­ments. The DRBC increased the dis­tance a gas well can be from pub­lic water sources from 500 feet in the Decem­ber pro­posal, to 1000 feet in the most recent draft. But envi­ron­men­tal­ists are unhappy with the reduc­tion in set­back require­ments when it comes to streams and wet­lands. The Decem­ber pro­posal had that dis­tance at 500 feet, the cur­rent pro­posal is 300 feet. Read more about the DRBC pro­posal and the envi­ron­men­tal­ists’ response below.

Comments

  • Wfehr

      Every coun­try in the world cel­e­brates the dis­cov­ery of hyr­dro­car­bons, except the United States. What many of the peo­ple opposed to the devel­op­ment of nat­ural gas are really opposed to is it’s devel­op­ment in their back yards. What in real­ity is a NIBMY issue is twisted into an envi­ron­men­tal issue with all type of fear­mon­ger­ing from peo­ple who want to use the energy but sim­ply don’t want it to be pro­duced near them.
       There is one word for that atti­tude, selfish.

  • Tom Shep­stone

    Could not agree more with Wfehr.  You nailed it, Wfehr!

About StateImpact

StateImpact seeks to inform and engage local communities with broadcast and online news focused on how state government decisions affect your lives.
Learn More »

Education