Florida

Putting Education Reform To The Test

How 20 Minutes With A Principal Determines 12 Months Of Teacher Pay

Sarah Gonzalez / StateImpact Florida

Miami teacher Karla Mats teaches special education science at Hialeah Middle School. She says she was observed by her principal for 20 minutes out of the school year, and she says that isn't enough time to fairly rate her performance.

When Florida teachers were evaluated last year, the stakes for most of them were pretty low.

No more. Soon, teacher evaluations will be tied to teacher pay.

Starting this year, half of a teacher’s evaluation is based on a classroom observation by the school principal. (The other half is based on a formula that predicts how students should score on the FCAT.)

But some principals observe teachers for just minutes out of the school year.

Hialeah Middle School teacher Karla Mats says she was observed once, for 20 minutes.

That’s the minimum set by the Miami-Dade school district.

Beginning teachers get an extra 20 minutes of principal observations for a grand total of 40 minutes out of the school year.

The Florida Department of Education doesn’t mandate how much time principals need to spend observing teachers. It’s up to each district.

Statewide, the range falls between 15 minutes and one hour.

School administrators defend the amount of time principals spend on evaluating teachers. But Mats says it’s not enough.

“I thought for sure this year they were going to come in all the time. And I only got one 20-minute observation,” she said. “That establishes the point that they don’t have enough time.”

Highly Effective

Mats was voted teacher of the year in 2011 by her colleagues at Hialeah Middle, where she teaches special education science.

This year, she was expecting the highest possible rating from her administrators.

“I do strive to get better every year and I do work hard at my practice so I thought, you know, I got it in the bag, I have nothing to worry about his year.”

State statute requires Florida principals give teachers one of four ratings: highly effective, effective, needs improvement, and unsatisfactory.

Mats received a rating of effective.

She says it feels like getting a B when you were shooting for an A.

“I really was expecting to have a much better result than I did,” she said. “I know that I have growth, I want to be a better teacher. But that doesn’t mean I’m not an A teacher.”

CHARLES TRAINOR JR. / Miami Herald

50 percent of teacher evaluations come from principal observations. The other half is based on a formula called the Value Added Model. It predicts how students should score on the state's standardized exam, and rates teachers based on how well their students measure up to that prediction.

Christine Master says being rated effective is something to feel good about. Master is administrative director of professional development in Miami-Dade. She helped implement the new teacher evaluation model.

“The word ‘effective’ means you are doing a very good job, you are doing what you should be doing,” Master said.

“Highly Effective is reserved. It means you are really doing your very best every single day consistently.”

She says 20 minutes is sufficient to rate a teacher.

“Because a teacher wouldn’t be doing the same thing for longer than 20 minutes,” Master said.

But Mats says 20 minutes isn’t enough time for principals to know whether any teacher is doing anything every single day.

She says it wouldn’t take much more time for principals to evaluate teachers for at least an entire class period.

At an average school with 80 teachers, that would mean the principal spends about 10 school days out of the entire school year formally observing teachers in their classrooms.

Mats appealed her rating to her principal, Lourdes Diaz, but her rating stayed the same.

“She told me that there were no teachers that were ‘highly effective’ and I thought that was such a slap in the face for all faculty because there are some dedicated teachers,” Mats said.

“There are some people that I really look up to and admire. They’re so seasoned and they do it so well. So that right there was a big red flag.”

Why 20 minutes?

The Miami-Dade school district said it would be inappropriate for her principal to comment on Mats’ rating. So we asked Laura Suprenard, a principal in Orlando, how many teachers got the top rating at her school, Shingle Creek Elementary.

“I thought for sure this year they were going to come in all the time. And I only got one 20 minute observation.”

-Karla Mats, Hialeah Middle School teacher

The answer? One.

Suprenard says that does not mean there is only one highly effective teacher at her school, though.

“Absolutely not,” Suprenard said. “There are many highly effective teachers but I do believe that we can all do a better job all the time.”

Suprenard says it is difficult for teachers to earn the highest rating in the first year of the new system.

In Orlando, the district minimum is three principal observations totaling 50 minutes:

  • One 30-minute formal observation
  • Two 10-minute informal observations

Beginning teachers get an extra 20 minutes.

As a principal, Suprenard says she spends more time walking in and out of classrooms than the minimum requirement.

“The whole purpose of my job is to be the instructional leader and be in my classrooms,” she said. “There are still many times you’re in the classroom but it’s not a formal or informal observation.”

More Paperwork

In the past, teacher evaluations focused mostly on teacher behaviors.

Now, the focus is more on student behaviors and student outcomes.

For example, principals used to look for behaviors like:

  1. Is the teacher asking one question at a time, or several questions at once?
  2. Is the teacher giving students enough time to answer that question?

Now, principals look more at whether students understand the questions teachers are asking them, and if they can communicate how those questions relate to their learning goals.

District officials say the new evaluation model requires a lot more reflection from school principals and much more paperwork.

Teacher Karla Mats says she understands that principals are busy with paperwork and managing the building.

“The reality is, I don’t think they have the time to go in there to watch the teachers, there is a lot of paperwork involved in the system,” she said.

But her job is on the line. She says principals need to speak up if they don’t have enough time.

“And maybe when people actually start talking about it, then there will be a good system in place, that will be adequate and fair to teachers.”

Comments

  • David4445

    School administrators high pay, teacher low and getting lower pay, politics, test taking teaching, political correctness…  has let school get in the way of an education…

    • Zrob

      In FL, it’s all about politics.  Politicians are making decisions for education they have no business making.  It’s pathetic, really.

      • dirhart

        Not just in Florida, believe me.

  • Teacher73

    What’s even more troubling for teachers is not the idea of an administrator observing you for small period of time and developing their rating (because in reality this rating is based much more on things they have seen all year rather than in the time they spent formally observing), but the second part of the rating system. The part by which 50% of your rating is determined by test scores that in many cases use tests that only take students a few minutes to complete two days out of the whole school year. That is not an accurate representation of a teacher’s ability or teaching.

  • dirhart

    That is about as much observation in any year as I ever had in 37 years of teaching.  The teacher is correct; it is not enough, but that’s one of many problems with educational administration.  Perhaps the higher stakes will lead to decent administrators, but I am not holding my breath.

  • Eleanor82

    As long as they keep the “highly effective” ratings down, they can give cause for lower/ no raises and have someone to blame when the kids tests scores are lower. Sad.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/CLA4GUV5N2SBE3JOSGTMPG77RU Y-City Jim

    Whoever came up with this rating system needs to read Daniel Pink or read the research his book is based on. Incentives (external motivation) does not work.

  • Bd28mull

    Many teachers genuinely distrust the system that determines their professional success and their earning potential. But we are hypocrites if we start whining about an evaluation system that has operated the same way for all those previous years, giving too many struggling teachers the illusion they were very competent when some weren’t. It is the sudden shift to the other extreme that is so disconcerting. By my calculations, a teacher can be rated as Effective which I agree is getting a B. Then have tremendous student annual growth and still be a B. In order to be Highly Effective overall, a teacher will need both tremendous student growth and the Highly Effective from the principal. No one has been able to provide an adequate answer to the question of what happens when a teacher receives a mediocre evaluation and has tremendous student growth indicating the teacher is likely highly effective after all. This evaluation system in Florida is unacceptable to most teachers, unfunded by the politicians, and is likely a device to hold down teacher pay. All of this is wrong and will slowly erode the ranks of teachers as the economy improves. The politicians in charge of public education in Florida repeatedly prove their incompetence and disdain for public education and as long as we foolihly reelect them we will reap the results. The final straw is that this types of evaluation system will likely drive a wedge between the school’s teachers and the school’s administrators making the entire process of providing effective educational results more problematical.

  • BigVB

    How such evaluative practices come to pass into law demonstrates a total lack of law based in empirical research. Taking 10 minutes to search for highly scholarly publications related to teacher observation, rating teachers, and student achievement scores would easily show that this whole system is inherently flawed. To the detriment of people’s LIVES when we talk about  how pay will be effected. 

  • Urabear

    A good administrator knows what their teachers are doing in their classrooms and don’t need to see a scheduled “horse & pony show” to determine if your doing what you should be doing. The evaluation tool is broken down into several areas which together = a system that evaluates.  It is a document that teachers should be reviewing to make sure they are a highly effective teacher. It is a teacher’s choice to determine on how effective they want to be and how they demonstrate their effectiveness. I don’t agree that 50% of the evaluation is based on test scores.  The state needs to create a less formal assessment that could be given quarterly to measure student learning gains & it would also assist teachers in making sure they are effectively reaching & teaching students. One test isn’t an effective way to measure students progress over the year. Also parents need to be held accountable and should have some sort of grading system attached to their involvement in their kids education. Working with their student in making sure they complete HW, attend school, and do their best. It is more than the teacher’s responsibity to make sure students are successful.

  • Genice:)

    I think this is very unfair.  Teachers should not be rated based on a 20 minute observation.  What happens if on their observation day she is not feeling her best?? or God forbid one of her students is acting up and he/she isn’t focused?  You can not judge a book based on its cover neither on its prologue! Let the parents and students rate them since they are the ones that have the most interaction with them.  Or better yet let their students grade speak for them.  This is just the opinion of a mere 10 year old.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=678370381 Catherine Shore Martinez

    Karla looks like a young, idealistic teacher.  She hasn’t learned the rule about the rock and the egg.  Teachers are the eggs and they always lose if they battle a rock.  Also, the rumor I heard was that very, very few teachers will get the highest rating.  That way, over the next few years the principal can increase the number of highly effective rated teachers and therefore show “growth”.  This will suggest that the principal is doing his or her job and that the system is “working”.

  • kate1song

    Both of my principals came in and observed together. They chatted and made comments loud enough for me to hear. It put me off, and I lost a bit of balance. The other teacher on my team, shows movies all the time. But he’s a great actor. When they came into his room, he put on a great 30 minute performance. He got a higher review. The next day he was back to showing movies. He told me once, that he can see if the principals are walking down the sidewalk to his room, and will change activities so it looks like he’s being “effective”. How fair is that?

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_KJHQCNCKOQX6UTAVMJU3F2TBSM lighght30

    Any teacher worth his or her salt doesn’t need an administrator in the classroom day after day. Ms. Mats’s administrator had a good enough look at her work. I’ll bet Ms. Mats IS a highly effective teacher, but as a previous poster commented, admins are not interested in creating a justification for her to ask for higher pay.

    Another problem, which I’ve not seen addressed, is the fact that administrators are “judging” the effectiveness of teachers who are teaching a subject the admin knows nothing about. A principal may very well have his or her personal certification in physical education, yet sits in a classroom assessing the effectiveness of a chemistry or language arts teacher. In most cases, classroom management can be accurately assessed, but not content area knowlege.

  • Sick&tired2013

    Education in FL is pathetic! Teachers are just being played with by some Marzano tool to cheat them out of their tenure, teaching position and retirement benefits! The funny thing is that they make these observations on how your doing it wrong…yet when asked for feedback you NEVER get any at all! Why? Because they don’t have a clue on what should go in the classroom. It’s sad! FL is just ruining education for these children!

  • beanstews

    So many of the educational decisions are made by people who are out of the classroom. Teachers are the experts in their field. They should be treated as such. They should be given educational opportunities, planning time, and decision making capabilities. If we want quality educators, we should treat them as professionals.

    http://atxteach.wordpress.com/2013/01/31/bad-teacher/

About StateImpact

StateImpact seeks to inform and engage local communities with broadcast and online news focused on how state government decisions affect your lives.
Learn More »

Education