Bringing the Economy Home


Idaho Voters Resoundingly Reject Propositions 1, 2 And 3


Kyle Stokes / StateImpact Indiana

This page will no longer be updated. For future coverage this topic go to Boise State Public Radio’s website.

With the results tallied from Idaho’s 967 precincts, voters clearly said no to Propositions 1, 2 and 3.

More than 645,000 votes were cast in each of the Propositions.  Each of the propositions failed by at least 15 percent of the vote.  Proposition 3, the measure that corresponds to giving each high school student a laptop, failed by the largest margin, with 66 percent of voters rejecting it.

Now that voters have weighed in on the trio of election laws that were passed in 2011, it’s up to lawmakers and stakeholders to determine what happens next.


In 2011 the Idaho Legislature passed a package of three laws which made sweeping changes to the state’s education system.

The laws were introduced and championed by Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Luna and are known as Students Come First, though opponents call them the Luna Laws.

The laws have been controversial in Idaho, with the state’s largest public teacher union, Democrats and some Republicans condemning them. School administrators and boards have been split on their support. Idaho’s second largest school district in Boise has voiced its opposition to the laws.

The three laws will be split up into Proposition 1, Proposition 2, and Proposition 3.  Here’s a breakdown of what each law contains:

Proposition 1

Proposition 1 corresponds to 2011’s Senate Bill 1108 and deals with labor relations.  A ‘yes’ vote will keep SB 1108 on the books, a ‘no’ vote will repeal the law.  Here are the details:

  • District superintendents, school administrators, and teachers get an annual evaluation. At least 50 percent of it must be based on measurable student growth. Teachers’ and principals’ evaluations must include parent input.
  • Teachers and school administrators get one or two year contracts. A category of contracts for experienced teachers that renewed automatically from year to year barring misconduct is eliminated. These renewable contracts will stay in place if signed before 2011.
  • Steps that had to be taken to fire a teacher or not bring him or her back for the next school year are eliminated such as providing a written statement of the reasons for the decision.
  • School districts no longer have to prove a financial emergency before reducing teacher numbers. School boards can reduce teacher numbers at their discretion but cannot consider seniority when deciding who to eliminate.
  • Principals can decide which teachers come to their schools.
  • Teachers are encouraged but not required to purchase liability insurance and districts must provide information about insurance providers.
  • The state’s early retirement incentive program for teachers is eliminated.
  • Local education organizations (labor unions) must represent a majority (more than 50 percent) of a district’s teachers in order to engage in collective bargaining.  Unions must prove annually that they represent a majority of a district’s teachers.
  • Contract negotiations can only cover compensation, defined as salary and benefits.  Negotiations must be done in public meetings.
  • If a district does not have a union that represents a majority of teachers the school board will set compensation.
  • If no contract agreement is reached through collective bargaining by June 10 of each year, the school board will set compensation.

Proposition 2

Proposition 2 corresponds to Senate Bill 1110 and institutes a pay-for-performance plan.  A ‘yes’ vote will keep SB 1110 on the books, a ‘no’ vote will repeal the law.

  • Bonuses are available for student academic growth measured by statewide standardized tests given each spring. Bonuses would go to all administrators and teachers at a school with a certain amount of improvement in scores.
  • All teachers and administrators at a school could get a bonus if the school’s average score on the spring test is in the top 50 percent of schools statewide.
  • Local school boards will create systems by which teachers and administrators can get bonuses based on other performance measures such as graduation rates, advanced placement classes taken and parental involvement.
  • Teachers can get bonuses for working in hard to fill positions. At least every two years the State Board of Education will determine which positions should be considered ‘hard to fill’ and rank them based on need. Local boards can choose from the state board’s list which positions are hardest to fill in their districts.
  • If a district can’t find a qualified teacher for a hard to fill position it can use some of the bonus money to train a teacher for the position.
  • A district can designate up to 25 percent of its teachers to get bonuses for working extra hours in leadership roles. Those could include activities like peer mentoring, curriculum development, grant writing and earning a “Master Teacher” designation.

Proposition 3

Proposition 3 corresponds to Senate Bill 1184 and deals with technology and funding.  A ‘yes’ vote will keep SB 1184 on the books, a ‘no’ vote will repeal the law.

  • A laptop computer will be provided for all high school teachers and students. That will happen over four years beginning with teachers in fall 2012.
  • As determined by the Idaho Board of Education, students must take two semester-long online classes to graduate.
  • Parents can enroll students in any qualified online course without district permission.
  • High schools will get more money to help pay for the costs of providing more math and science classes to meet new graduation requirements.
  • SB 1184 Creates a formula for allocating money for technology. That includes mobile computers for high school students, wireless broadband service in high schools, and professional development on using technology in class.
  • Creates a formula for allocating money to districts that takes online classes into account.
  • Increases the amount districts can spend to get instruction from other districts or provide virtual education.
  • The Idaho Department of Education will post a fiscal report card for each school district on its website.
  • Each school district must post its annual budget and master labor agreement on its website. That’s in addition to several pieces of financial information districts were already required to post.
  • A district can employ fewer teachers than it gets money for (up to 10 percent starting in 2014) without losing the money it gets for the unfilled positions.
  • Raises the minimum teacher salary by $355 to $30,000 a year.
  • Eliminates a $2,000, five year bonus for “Master Teacher” designation.
  • If a student has completed all graduation requirements by the beginning of her senior year the state will pay for her to take up to 36 college credits while still being registered as a high school student. She can also take college credits in her last semester if she meets graduation requirements by the end of the first semester.
  • Public post-secondary schools in Idaho can operate charter high schools.

Boise State Public Radio reporter Adam Cotterell contributed.

Latest Posts

Election Day: Idahoans Cast Their Votes On Propositions 1, 2 And 3

The most potent statewide issue on this Election Day is the tug-of-war over Propositions 1, 2 and 3. Today, as we have talked to voters at polling places in the Boise area, we’ve asked how they decided to vote, and why. The propositions correspond to three education laws that the Legislature approved in 2011.  The […]

Secret Donor List, Now Public, Reveals Powerful Interests Backing Props 1, 2, 3 Fight

When financial disclosure reports from Education Voters of Idaho were posted online yesterday, a narrative died.  The reports show that 23 contributors gave a total of $641,160 to the group, which is working to uphold the package of controversial education laws known as Students Come First. More than two-thirds of that $641,160 total came from […]

NYC’s Mayor Bloomberg, Albertsons’ Heir Donate To Pro-Props 1, 2, 3 Campaign

We originally reported that Foster Friess donated $50,000 to Education Voters of Idaho.  He gave $25,000. Right now, the question in the mind of every Idaho journalist is: Why did New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg give $200,000 to a campaign supporting Idaho’s controversial Students Come First laws? Bloomberg is among the donors listed on […]

HP Laptop Contract Makes Idaho Tech Jobs An Issue In Props 1, 2, 3 Vote

Idaho’s Students Come First laws are controversial for a lot of reasons.  There are the limits the laws impose on teachers’ unions, and the effects on teachers’ job security. This week, when Gov. C.L. “Butch” Otter announced that Hewlett-Packard has won a $180 million contract to provide computers, maintenance and technical support to every high […]

Props 1, 2, And 3: Voter’s Guide To Idaho’s Controversial Education Laws

Boise State Public Radio reporter Adam Cotterell contributed to this report. On November 6, voters will decide if Propositions 1, 2 and 3, Idaho’s controversial education laws, stay or go. In 2011, the Idaho Legislature passed a package of three laws that made sweeping changes to the state’s education system. The laws were introduced and championed […]

Tom Luna And Brian Cronin To Debate Idaho Education Reform Laws

Idaho Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Luna will defend his education reform laws tomorrow at the City Club of Boise luncheon. The laws known as Students Come First passed the Legislature in 2011 and are now on the November ballot for repeal. Luna’s debate partner is Brian Cronin.  Cronin is a current Democratic legislator, but […]

Any Way You Slice It, Idaho Education Spending Cuts Are Near The Top

The Idaho Statesman’s latest editorial is in response to two stories StateImpact posted on Idaho’s education funding cuts. The Center on Budget Policy and Priorities released a report last week that shows education cuts in Idaho have been among the deepest in the nation over the last five years. CBPP’s report finds per-student spending in Idaho […]

Idaho Education Department Disputes Funding Cuts Are Near The Top In The Nation

A recent report by the non-partisan research organization Center on Budget Policy and Priorities says education cuts in Idaho have been among the deepest in the nation over the last five years. As StateImpact reported last week, CBPP’s study shows per-student spending in Idaho has dropped 19 percent since 2008. Just three states have cut […]

About StateImpact

StateImpact seeks to inform and engage local communities with broadcast and online news focused on how state government decisions affect your lives.
Learn More »