Pennsylvania

Energy. Environment. Economy.

Obama Proposes $14 Million for Fracking Research

Susan Phillips / StateImpactPA

EPA Admin­is­tra­tor Lisa Jack­son speaks to reporters at an event in Philadelphia.

Pres­i­dent Obama’s pro­posed FY 2013 Envi­ron­men­tal Pro­tec­tion Agency bud­get has a reduc­tion of 1.2 per­cent, or $105 mil­lion dol­lars, from the pre­vi­ous year. It’s the third year in a row the agency has had to endure cuts. The pro­posed reduc­tion comes at a time when the EPA has come under fire from Repub­li­can law­mak­ers, and some pres­i­den­tial can­di­dates, who say the agency has engaged in over-regulatory zeal.

But some of those same pres­i­den­tial can­di­dates have faced ques­tions about the dan­gers of frack­ing on the cam­paign trail. And the bud­get announced today includes research funds ded­i­cated to the impact of hydraulic frac­tur­ing. The pro­posed $14 mil­lion dol­lars will sup­port research in con­junc­tion with the U.S. Geo­log­i­cal Sur­vey and the Depart­ment of Energy that will “begin to assess poten­tial impacts of hydraulic frac­tur­ing on air qual­ity, water qual­ity, and ecosystems.”

The EPA’s total research bud­get of $576 mil­lion includes $81 mil­lion for the agency’s STAR grants, which will sup­port research on frack­ing, poten­tial endocrine dis­rup­tors, and green infra­struc­ture. At the end of this year, the EPA expects to release pre­lim­i­nary results of their cur­rent study on the impact of frack­ing to drink­ing water sup­plies. The study includes areas of Mar­cel­lus Shale drilling in Pennsylvania.

EPA Admin­is­tra­tor Lisa Jack­son said dif­fi­cult choices had to be made with this budget.

“This bud­get is focused on ful­fill­ing EPA’s core mis­sion to pro­tect health and the envi­ron­ment for mil­lions of Amer­i­can fam­i­lies,” said Jack­son. It demon­strates fis­cal respon­si­bil­ity, while still sup­port­ing clean air, healthy waters and inno­v­a­tive safe­guards that are essen­tial to an Amer­ica built to last.”

The EPA bud­get also includes an increase of $11 mil­lion over FY 2012 for a total of $68 mil­lion dol­lars to “reduce chem­i­cal risks, increase the pace of chem­i­cal haz­ard assess­ments, and pro­vide the pub­lic with greater access to toxic chem­i­cal information.”

Jack­son also told reporters on a con­fer­ence call this after­noon that the pro­posed bud­get includes a 5.8 per­cent increase in com­pli­ance and enforcement.

Comments

  • Dory Hip­pauf

    You Can’t Tell the Play­ers With­out a Scorecard!Connecting the Dots: The Mar­cel­lus Nat­ural Gas Play Play­ers – Part 1By Dory Hippaufhttp://commonsense2.com/2011/12/naturalgasdrilling/connecting-the-dots-the-marcellus-natural-gas-play-players-part-1/
    Chesa­peake Energy –  Peek­ing Behind the Cur­tain­Con­nect­ing the Dots: The Mar­cel­lus Nat­ural Gas Play Play­ers – Part 2By Dory Hippaufhttp://commonsense2.com/2012/01/national-politics/connecting-the-dots-the-marcellus-natural-gas-play-players-part-2/
    Energy-in-Depth (EID):  The “GAS”rootsConnecting the Dots: The Mar­cel­lus Nat­ural Gas Play Play­ers – Part 3By Dory Hippaufhttp://commonsense2.com/2012/02/naturalgasdrilling/connecting-the-dots-the-marcellus-natural-gas-play-players-part-3/

About StateImpact

StateImpact seeks to inform and engage local communities with broadcast and online news focused on how state government decisions affect your lives.
Learn More »

Education