Pennsylvania

Energy. Environment. Economy.

Local Officials Slam Impact Fee’s Zoning Restrictions

Scott Detrow / StateIm­pact Pennsylvania

Dozens of local offi­cials spoke out against the impact fees at Tuesday’s meeting

Town­ship and bor­ough man­agers, coun­cil mem­bers and super­vi­sors are push­ing back against Repub­li­can lead­ers who want to limit local gov­ern­ments’ abil­ity to zone nat­ural gas drilling.

Two impact fees in front of state law­mak­ers would place firm guide­lines on what munic­i­pal­i­ties can and can’t reg­u­late, when it comes to Mar­cel­lus Shale activ­ity. Local offi­cials con­cerned about the mea­sures filled Green Tree, Allegheny County’s munic­i­pal build­ing tonight, and railed against the two impact fees for more than two hours.

Rich Gross­man, a plan­ner in Slip­pery Rock, But­ler County, was one of the first speakers.

Scott Detrow / StateIm­pact Pennsylvania

Slip­pery Rock plan­ner Rich Grossman

Gross­man pointed out that as a uni­ver­sity town, Slip­pery Rock has dealt with its share of zon­ing headaches.  Plan­ners recently issued their first con­di­tional use per­mit to a Mar­cel­lus Shale rig, he said. “And the township’s posi­tion on that is they plan care­fully for where in this unique com­mu­nity the devel­op­ment of oil and gas can occur, just as they plan care­fully in their unique com­mu­nity, where appro­pri­ate places are for fra­ter­nity houses, light and heavy indus­try, and com­mer­cial uses.”

Grossman’s wor­ried the two impact fees would erode local power. “If the state leg­is­la­ture pre­empts the abil­ity of a munic­i­pal­ity to reg­u­late this one indus­try, why not pre­empt the abil­ity to reg­u­late every industry?”

Sup­port­ers of the bills say that’s already the case. Munic­i­pal­i­ties can’t pass their own gun con­trol laws in Penn­syl­va­nia, and local dri­ving reg­u­la­tions are strictly lim­ited. The impact fee’s zon­ing restric­tions are based on the 2005 ACRE law, which bars local gov­ern­ments from zon­ing most agri­cul­tural activ­i­ties. Kathryn Klaber heads the Mar­cel­lus Shale Coali­tion, which rep­re­sents drillers in Pennsylvania.vIn a recent inter­view with StateIm­pact, she said the indus­try needs statewide zon­ing con­sis­tency in order to keep grow­ing. “The clar­ity, what is so impor­tant,” said Klaber, “is that you under­stand what’s com­ing. And com­pa­nies can plan for – and the nat­ural gas indus­try plans for quite a few reg­u­la­tions and requirements.”

Sev­eral of the speak­ers at the meet­ing acknowl­edged the indus­try posi­tion, but coun­tered, that, well, com­mu­ni­ties need clar­ity, too. Peo­ple want to move into a neigh­bor­hood, and know a fac­tory or strip mall won’t be built next door.

Richard Ward, the man­ager of Robin­son Town­ship, Wash­ing­ton County, argued  that con­sis­tency comes from zon­ing. “It allows us to pre­dict how and when and where things are going to hap­pen in our com­mu­ni­ties,” he said. “That, to me, is more impor­tant than bal­anc­ing that against the needs of the indus­try. Not say­ing the needs of the indus­try are not impor­tant, but I believe the needs of the pop­u­la­tion out­weighs that.”

The meet­ing began calm, with Ward and other local offi­cials deliv­er­ing Pow­er­Point pre­sen­ta­tions on leg­isla­tive details. The crowd grew feisty as the evening wore on. Pitts­burgh City Coun­cil­man Doug Shields stirred the pot, rail­ing on big energy com­pa­nies for their large profit mar­gins, and then blast­ing the impact fee’s plan to let the state Attor­ney Gen­eral decide whether local zon­ing mea­sures are rea­son­able. “The Attor­ney General’s going to be the final arbiter of every­thing? When the hell did the attor­ney gen­eral become the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania?”

Sev­eral peo­ple wor­ried the ses­sion was too lit­tle, too late, point­ing the Sen­ate has sched­uled an impact fee vote for today. But the leg­is­la­tion is far from a done deal.

House and Sen­ate lead­ers are still nego­ti­at­ing the final measure’s details. They haven’t agreed on whether a fee would be issued by the county or state, among other issues. Today’s Sen­ate vote is a pro­ce­dural maneu­ver, aimed at mov­ing nego­ti­a­tions to a joint con­fer­ence committee.

Whether the bill passes this week or next year, Wanda God­frey of Mur­rysville, West­more­land County, wor­ried she’s skep­ti­cal local gov­ern­ments can stop it, at this point. “I think what’s going to hap­pen is we’re going to have to do some kind of a law­suit. I think we are going to have to get orga­nized as town­ships,” she said.

They might have a bit more time to orga­nize: the Sen­ate goes home for the year after today, so a final impact fee vote will likely have to wait until 2012.

Comments

  • anon

    A land of the free, or a land of the free market?

    • Jmbellpa

      In a free mar­ket one indus­try doesn’t get to stand on the shoul­ders of the pop­u­lace while all the other have to play by the rules democ­racy has set to pro­tect it citizens.  

      • Jckeys73

        Recite the US pledge. You will find that a repub­lic is ruled by law not a democ­racy. Lawyers rep­re­sent­ing big money become lob­by­ists or politi­cians who shape these care­fully worded laws to favor their agendas.

  • anon

    A land of the free, or a land of the free market?

  • Penguin5b

    NPR needs to be defunded NOW. Let’s see…George Soros, ultra-progressive, ultra lib­eral, gives 1.8 mil­lion to NPR to start his pet project called “State Impact”. Now go to the NPR site, specif­i­cally the State Impact area. Look who else is cur­rently fund­ing it:

    Doris Duke Char­i­ta­ble Foun­da­tion
    Ethics & Excel­lence in Jour­nal­ism Foun­da­tion
    The William and Flora Hewlett Foun­da­tion
    The Melville Char­i­ta­ble Trust
    Open Soci­ety Foun­da­tion
    The Wal­lace Foun­da­tion
    Ultra pro­gres­sives all. Now, does any honest-thinking per­son actu­ally believe that report­ing born of this parent­age will be fair and bal­anced? Any­one? If you doubt me just visit the sites of the 8 dif­fer­ent states cov­ered by State Impact and look at the issues focused on and the slanted cov­er­age thereof.

    Here in PA the major focus is drilling the Mar­cel­lus shale. EVERY SINGLE STORY is a hit piece against the indus­try and are lit­tle more than op/ed columns. State Impact? Couldn’t “impact” be both good and bad? Then where are the sto­ries about how drilling has ben­e­fited PA? Jobs, tax rev­enue, eco­nomic plusses, less reliance on for­eign energy, among oth­ers. Surely these things should rate at least a story or two every now and then.

    But I’m sure Scott Detrow and Suzy Phillps would like to keep their jobs. And when your bosses are Soros and Ann Bee­son, well you just bet­ter be sure to toe the line.

    So how about it Scott &Suzy? How about a lit­tle bal­ance? Surely not every per­son in PA is against drilling. Maybe you could find a few and stick your mic in their faces, as repul­sive as you find this to be. You see, if you really want your sto­ries to have the “impact” that Soros/Beeson intended with their grant, here’s what to do: Prac­tice some hon­est, objec­tive jour­nal­ism and print of few of those sto­ries I men­tioned. That way, your hit pieces will actu­ally have more legit­i­macy by com­par­i­son. Get it? I’m not sure that Soros/Beeson will be pleased, but if they remove you from the project at least you’ll have the sat­is­fac­tion that you actu­ally per­formed what you got into the jour­nal­ism busi­ness to do — tell the truth.

About StateImpact

StateImpact seeks to inform and engage local communities with broadcast and online news focused on how state government decisions affect your lives.
Learn More »

Education