Pennsylvania

Energy. Environment. Economy.

A Guide To Dimock’s Water Problems

Michael Loc­cisano / Getty Images

Dimock PA res­i­dents Kelly Saut­ner and her father and mother Craig Saut­ner and Julie Saut­ner, show­ing their tap water sample.

Yes­ter­day, we told you about the Depart­ment of Envi­ron­men­tal Protection’s rul­ing that Cabot Oil and Gas no longer needs to sup­ply waterto res­i­dents of Dimock, Susque­hanna County

Look­ing for back­ground infor­ma­tion on Dimock and its methane migra­tion prob­lems? A good first stop is this April 2009 Prop­ub­lica arti­cle, which labeled the com­mu­nity “ground zero for drilling in the Mar­cel­lus Shale.”

Norma Fiorentino’s drink­ing water well was a time bomb. For weeks, work­ers in her small north­east­ern Penn­syl­va­nia town had been plumb­ing nat­ural gas deposits from a drilling rig a few hun­dred yards away. They cracked the earth and pumped in flu­ids to force the gas out. Some­how, stray gas worked into tiny crevasses in the rock, leak­ing upward into the aquifer and slip­ping qui­etly into Fiorentino’s well. Then, accord­ing to the state’s work­ing the­ory, a motor­ized pump turned on in her well house, flicked a spark and caused a New Year’s morn­ing blast that tossed aside a con­crete slab weigh­ing sev­eral thou­sand pounds.

Fiorentino wasn’t home at the time, so it’s dif­fi­cult to know exactly what hap­pened. But after­ward, state offi­cials found methane, the largest com­po­nent of nat­ural gas, in her drink­ing water. If the fumes that built up in her well house had col­lected in her base­ment, the explo­sion could have killed her.

Ever since a water well blew up on Jan­u­ary 1, 2009, Dimock has become a national poster child for prob­lems asso­ci­ated with nat­ural gas drilling. One of the many arti­cles writ­ten about the town­ship in national pub­li­ca­tions: A June 2010 Van­ity Fair piece. Under Gov­er­nor Ren­dell, DEP took an aggres­sive stance against Cabot.

DEP’s rul­ing came after the release of new infor­ma­tion, show­ing methane migra­tion has sub­sisted in the com­mu­nity, despite a mora­to­rium on Cabot drilling. Anti-drilling activists have made it clear they’ll push back against the state’s deci­sion, call­ing it their “Alamo.”

One thing’s clear. Regard­less of who caused the con­t­a­m­i­na­tion, many Dimock res­i­dents have undrink­able water, and DEP’s rul­ing will have major finan­cial impli­ca­tions for peo­ple who need to truck in potable water, as the AP reported yesterday.

Bill Ely, 60, said the water com­ing out of his well looks like milk.

“You put your hand down a cou­ple of inches and you can’t see your hand, that’s how much gas there is in it. And they’re telling me it was that way all my life,” said Ely, who has lived in the fam­ily home­stead for nearly 50 years and said his well water was crys­tal clear until Cabot’s arrival three years ago.

If Cabot stops refill­ing his 550-gallon plas­tic “water buf­falo” that sup­plies water for bathing and wash­ing clothes, Ely said it will cost him $250 per week to main­tain it and another $20,000 to $30,000 to install a per­ma­nent sys­tem to pipe water from an untainted spring on his land.

Ely and another res­i­dent, Vic­to­ria Switzer, said their attor­neys had promised to seek an injunc­tion in the event that DEP gave Cabot per­mis­sion to halt deliv­er­ies. The attor­neys did not imme­di­ately return an email and phone call seek­ing comment.

Comments

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Tom-Shepstone/1156648308 Tom Shep­stone

    Last Saut­ner dis­solved methane tests were non-detect and they refuse treat­ment sys­tems anyway.

    • Anony­mous

      These peo­ple were given twice the value of their home (the money is in an escrow account for them)they get to keep the home, they get to keep the roy­al­ties, they were offered free treat­ment sys­tems, and they can con­tinue to sue Cabot.  They won’t take treat­ment or the money.  I recently read on EID they have also been offered the value of their homes by a pri­vate per­son.  So they have twice the value plus the value again and they can move but won’t. If they want to stay and they don’t want the free treat­ment sys­tem they have the money in the escrow account and can pur­chase one of their choos­ing. I’m guess­ing that  they hired a group of lawyers who did a lot of work for them and are now expect­ing to get paid for the work they were hired to do.  You can’t hire some­one and then after work­ing for you for quite a while decide you are going to fire them and not pay them can you? 

      • Lind­say

        I know for a fact that at least one point in your “facts” is a com­plete lie.  I’ve seen the treat­ment sys­tem in the Saut­ners’ base­ment.  Cabot’s been deliv­er­ing water because the treat­ment sys­tem never fully worked.  The way these peo­ple have been hung out to dry is atrocious.

        • Anony­mous

          Since I actu­ally have a treat­ment sys­tem and it works you are the one who lies!!!!!!!!!!!!I If you read back thru the net you will read where she stated she decided her treat­ment sys­tem didn’t work it took it off line her­self. Before you pick a side you had bet­ter do your home­work first. You may end up being embar­rassed in the end.

          • Anony­mous

            @ Fact­sR­told (OLD Bat).…… I told you stop with your lies! Come on Char really? The DEP took it off line,
            http://www.cabotog.com/vids/clean_water.html

          • Anony­mous
          • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jenny-Hrvatska/729516958 Jenny Hrvatska

            fact­sR­told, so what works in one sit­u­a­tion works in every sit­u­a­tion? It must be reas­sur­ing to live in a world where every­thing is the same everywhere.

          • Get­The­Facts

            If it didn’t work wouldn’t you say try some­thing else?  Or would you just flat out say we wont let you try?  Did you ever think these peo­ple just don’t want the water fixed?  Did you know they never drank the water?  Did you know  the home had issues before they pur­chased it? If it was all about the water don’t you think they’d let them  try and fix it until it was fixed?

          • Pasissy1

            we want a water line and will get one! and we dont want them to drill or frack in Dimock any­more! you think you know about us…your noth­ing but an OLD liar! Get your facts straight first…CHEMICALS IN THE WATER< you come and drink it

      • Anony­mous
    • mon­trose­man

      non detect my ass there is clearly some­thing in the water i was vis­it­ing some­one in dimock and got a glass of water from the sink and was dis­gusted with the taste and smell smells almost like play­dough and tastes horrible

    • Anony­mous
  • http://twitter.com/knappAP Mike Knapp

    How is it “clear” that res­i­dents in Dimock have undrink­able water?  As noted in the story, the DEP has taken a VERY hard line with Cabot in regards to the drink­ing water in Dimock.  Why would DEP sud­denly reverse its course and allow Cabot to dis­con­tinue water ser­vice if they weren’t 100% con­vinced the issues have been reme­died and the water is safe?

  • Anony­mous

    Anti-drill are call­ing it their “Alamo”? No, the truth is they’ve man­aged to manip­u­late a hand­ful of peo­ple for a cou­ple years into being their “spokesper­sons”.  The other 99% of Dimock peo­ple are happy with both their water and the drilling.  If the water is so bad, how come not all of the peo­ple in the area sued?  How come some have proven their water drink­able?  How come the Saut­ners or oth­ers have not released any reports to con­tra­dict the results released by URS, the inde­pen­dent water test­ing com­pany who pro­vided the results?  How come when there are events arranged to bring atten­tion to the so-called prob­lem to atten­tion, do only three or four actual Dimock res­i­dents show up and the rest are from New York.  These same events are arranged by New York peo­ple and groups with agen­das.  Lit­tle has been reported about Dimock for months until the sGEIS re-issued in New York State and pub­lic hear­ings announced.
    The water is fine, the peo­ple are fine, and many Dimock res­i­dents (and other Susque­hanna County res­i­dents) are tired of being used as the anti-drill’s poster child.  For those of you who say the DEP was bought out or looked the other way or what have you, it’s merely spoiled grapes.

    • Anony­mous

      If they were telling the truth they wouldn’t think it was some­thing to joke about.  It looks like they were hav­ing fun when this was made. I guess it’s all about money and the 15 min. of fame they had and just couldn’t get enough of.  Enough is enough have them pay that mas­sive lawyer bill and take the water away.  It’s time they look in the mir­ror. It’s not a very pretty sight is it?!   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OF-MI-5k34w

      • famous­ga­landi­likeit

        Sounds like your a jeal­ous Old bat that likes to make videos for Cabot

  • Keep Kick­ing

    The methane that was found in these res­i­dents water sup­ply was ther­mo­genic, and dis­turbed by the indus­try from deep shale (as I’ve heard every gasser out there rip these poor peo­ple from insin­u­at­ing that the methane was nat­ural to they put chem­i­cals in it them­selves) and proven by the John Hanger’s watch of the DEP.  Since then, the reigns have been handed over to $1.2 mil­lion polit­i­cally moti­vated paid-for-by-the-gas indus­try Tom Cor­bett who pays Krancer to ‘look the other way’.  I give these peo­ple in Dimock credit for not sign­ing the non-disclosure so the indus­try can con­tinue its cha­rade of ‘no doc­u­mented cases’.  Why should any­one be forced off their home­land for some­one say­ing, ‘hey, here’s twice what your house is worth?’  To the neigh­bors of these poor peo­ple who just want them to go away so they can con­tinue their pil­lage­ing of the good Lord’s earth for money (the root of all evil), shame on you for not hav­ing any sense of com­mu­nity and I’m glad I don’t live there or next to you.  Please don’t buy a retire­ment home next to me after you’ve ruined the beau­ti­ful land in PA.  If this is how you act towards your fel­low broth­ers and sis­ters, please remove ‘you have a friend in PA’ off your license plate.  You’re cer­tainly no friend of the envi­ron­ment or your neighbor.

About StateImpact

StateImpact seeks to inform and engage local communities with broadcast and online news focused on how state government decisions affect your lives.
Learn More »

Education