Florida

Putting Education Reform To The Test

Science Blogger Finds Problems With FCAT Questions

Nick J. Webb / Flickr

A science blogger has found problems with Florida's FCAT science test.

“The Happy Scientist,” blogger Robert Krampf, notes a number of problems with practice questions for Florida’s 5th and 8th grade FCAT science exams.

Among the issues are correct answers that rely on incorrect definitions, and answers test designers consider incorrect but actually are scientifically correct.

An example:

A glossary of definitions (Appendix C) is provided for test item writers to indicate the level of understanding expected of fifth grade students. Included in that list is the following definition:

Predator—An organism that obtains nutrients from other organisms.

By that definition, cows are predators because they obtain nutrients from plants. The plants are predators too, since they obtain nutrients from decaying remains of other organisms. I have yet to find anyone who thinks that this is a proper definition of a predator.

And another:

This sample question offers the following observations, and asks which is scientifically testable.

  1. The petals of red roses are softer than the petals of yellow roses.
  2. The song of a mockingbird is prettier than the song of a cardinal.
  3. Orange blossoms give off a sweeter smell than gardenia flowers.
  4. Sunflowers with larger petals attract more bees than sunflowers with smaller petals.

The document indicates that 4 is the correct answer, but answers 1 and 3 are also scientifically testable.

For answer 1, the Sunshine State Standards list texture as a scientifically testable property in the third grade (SC.3.P.8.3), fourth grade (SC.4.P.8.1), and fifth grade (SC.5.P.8.1), so even the State Standards say it is a scientifically correct answer.

For answer 3, smell is a matter of chemistry. Give a decent chemist the chemical makeup of the scent of two different flowers, and she will be able to tell you which smells sweeter without ever smelling them.

While this question has three correct answers, any student that answered 1 or 3 would be graded as getting the question wrong. Why use scientifically correct “wrong” answers instead of using responses that were actually incorrect? Surely someone on the Content Advisory Committee knew enough science to spot this problem.

Krampf said he called the state Department of Education about the errors and was told the questions were approved by a content committee. Another official said though the second example included multiple answers that are correct, only the third answer is part of the curriculum for a 5th grade student,

Krampf notes one other problem: The tests are not subject to public review, which means no one knows how many poorly worded questions or answers are on the exam.

Comments

  • Brevardsandra

    Thank you for this coverage. The FL DOE has responsibility and accountability for poor performance in test development. Who pays? Who benefits?

  • Bikebird110

    Here’s one for you:  middle school end of year course exam (Algebra) on computer.  Teacher/proctor is not permitted to read the question, only to assist with students and computer operating issues.  Student works through problem on scratch paper, and finds that his/her answer doesn’t match with any choices given.  Teacher looks at problem worked out on scratch paper, and determines that the child has correctly answered the problem, but the correct answer is not one listed.  Teacher can do nothing about it since he/she is not permitted to read the test, only the test prompts.  School therefore does nothing.  Child has no defense, and since testing by computer is graded by computer, the testing company is not held accountable. 
    This really happened in my school, and is only one anecdotal piece of evidence which we are actually not permitted to provide.  So how do you hold test makers like Pearson accountable?  While this is not an FCAT example, it is an example of testing students to death with no common sense in sight.

    • Carolyam

      WE have seen this often … in some tests that were to prepare the kids — mini tests.  I cannot tell you how many countless times I found mistakes, and the kids answered correctly, but because the “machine” said it was a certain answer, they got it incorrect!!  go figure.  SAD indeed.

  • nancy connolly

    Go Robert Krampf! I am glad to see that someone with a science background is looking in to these types of things.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Dave-Russell/1642988753 Dave Russell

    This is typical. The nation as a whole takes at face value the idea that 1) all curriculum is age and cognitively appropriate for kids, 2) a curriculum taught with fidelity leaves no gaps, 3) tests are aligned perfectly with the curriculum, and 4) no errors or omissions exists on tests. This article proves that errors and omissions occurred on the test, Anyone teaching math understands that curricula leaves glaring skill, content and conceptual gaps. And anyone who has looked at kindergarten standards or standards as they progress through the grades soon realizes that the curriculum is NOT age and cognitively appropriate for kids. It is a travesty of systems and design indifference whose structure has the unintended consequences of leaving most kids flummoxed and increasing numbers turning their backs to educational opportunities and dropping out.

  • Bigdhlwd

    I am sitting here with my mouth open, because two weeks ago I was reading that “soft petals” question on the DOE website and ranting to my friend about how the question was using terrible science to test 5th graders. She and I both volunteer in public schools doing hands on science and both of us have science degrees. These tests are bad ” gotcha” tools that do nothing to test real science knowledge, and will turn kids who are excited about science into frustrated, science-hating robots. The state claims to care about STEM subjects, but this is an example of how politicians, test companies, and others who are hundreds of miles from actual classrooms are grading our children. It makes me so sad for curious, potential young scientists.

  • Me

    Well, I guess this is why we are so far down the list of “smartest states.” Terrible education. I’m a product of this as well… BOO!!! :o (

  • Nelliesniche

    And people wonder why I homeschool my grandchildren! I was a public school teacher for 17 years and retired to homeschool my granddaughters. They have been home schooled since kindergarten and one is now in 10th grade and the other in 5th grade and please don’t start about their socialization!

  • fcatastrophe

    My 6th grader is in an accelerated math class in a Broward public school.  A few weeks ago she was doing her homework, a packet of practice questions for the math FCAT, and there was a question about the area of a circle.  She knew the formula she was supposed to use – it’s pi times the radius squared – but none of the multiple choice answers had pi in them.  Instead, a couple of them had the fraction 22/7, which were not numbers that corresponded to anything in the question.  It took both of us quite a while to figure out that the fraction was there in place of pi. Is the testing company deliberately trying to trick the kids, or do they just not care, as long as they can take the money and run?

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/XFA2DL7V2A7PZ7EKZT554AMONY LJE

    Actually, #2 is testable also if you operationally define the term “sweeter” as having a certain number of notes or a musical pattern rated as “sweet” by a significant majority of listeners. It is called operationalizing an abstract concept. 
    http://www.experiment-resources.com/operationalization.html

About StateImpact

StateImpact seeks to inform and engage local communities with broadcast and online news focused on how state government decisions affect your lives.
Learn More »

Education