A photo of a Delmarva bay in spring shows the wetland flooded. In summer and fall this same wetland is dry. This isolated wetland fell under Obama's Waters of the U.S. Rule. Under a Trump administration proposal, federal protection for many wetlands would be removed.
Courtesy of DNREC
Federal judge reverses Trump decision on clean water protections
The decision, which could be appealed, restored the rule in 26 states.
Susan Phillips tells stories about the consequences of political decisions on people's every day lives. She has worked as a reporter for WHYY since 2004. Susan's coverage of the 2008 Presidential election resulted in a story on the front page of the New York Times. In 2010 she traveled to Haiti to cover the earthquake. That same year she produced an award-winning series on Pennsylvania's natural gas rush called "The Shale Game." She received a 2013 Alfred I. duPont-Columbia University Journalism Award for her work covering natural gas drilling in Pennsylvania. She has also won several Edward R. Murrow awards for her work with StateImpact. In 2013/14 she spent a year at MIT as a Knight Science Journalism Fellow. She has also been a Metcalf Fellow, an MBL Logan Science Journalism Fellow and reported from Marrakech on the 2016 climate talks as an International Reporting Project Fellow. A graduate of Columbia School of Journalism, she earned her Bachelor's degree in International Relations from George Washington University.
Courtesy of DNREC
A photo of a Delmarva bay in spring shows the wetland flooded. In summer and fall this same wetland is dry. This isolated wetland fell under Obama's Waters of the U.S. Rule. Under a Trump administration proposal, federal protection for many wetlands would be removed.
A federal court has reversed a Trump Administration decision regarding protections of small waterways. The move marks a victory for environmentalists fighting deregulation.
The Waters of the U.S. Rule clarified which tiny streams or wetlands are protected from pollution under the Clean Water Act.
President Trump got rid of it earlier this year as part of his commitment to environmental deregulation.
Now, a federal judge is restoring the rule in 26 states.
The judge said the EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers violated federal law by not allowing for public comment.
“By refusing to allow public comment and consider the merits of the WOTUS rule and the 1980s regulation, the agencies did not allow a ‘meaningful opportunity’ to comment,” U.S. District Judge David Norton wrote. He found the agencies were “arbitrary and capricious.”
Geoff Gisler is an attorney with the Southern Environmental Law Center.
“This administration has shown a pattern of blatantly violating federal law and shutting out the public,” he said.
This latest ruling worries farmers and builders who opposed the Obama-era rule, saying it would harm business.
The EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers say they’re reviewing the ruling to decide whether to appeal.
StateImpact Pennsylvania is a collaboration among WITF, WHYY, and the Allegheny Front. Reporters Reid Frazier, Rachel McDevitt and Susan Phillips cover the commonwealth’s energy economy. Read their reports on this site, and hear them on public radio stations across Pennsylvania.
Climate Solutions, a collaboration of news organizations, educational institutions and a theater company, uses engagement, education and storytelling to help central Pennsylvanians toward climate change literacy, resilience and adaptation. Our work will amplify how people are finding solutions to the challenges presented by a warming world.