Energy. Environment. Economy.

Budget talks heating up severance tax debate in Harrisburg

Pennsylvania's state Capitol in Harrisburg.

Scott LaMar / WITF-FM

Pennsylvania's state Capitol in Harrisburg.

Facing down a large state budget shortfall and a July 1 deadline, Pennsylvania lawmakers are putting all of their options on the table – including a severance tax on natural gas production. Meanwhile, the mounting budget pressure has both sides of the severance tax debate vying for public support.

On one side are boosters of natural gas development who say additional taxes could force the industry to leave Pennsylvania. On the other side are Democrats and some Republicans searching for a way to plug the budget hole.

A new poll released Tuesday – commissioned by the Marcellus Shale Coalition, an industry trade group – shows general support for a severance tax among Pennsylvania voters. Fifty-five percent of respondents said they are in favor of a tax, while 34 percent oppose it.

However, the survey shows most voters (57 percent) would not support a tax if the revenue generated would pay for public employee pensions or if it resulted in Pennsylvanians losing jobs (58 percent).

In a statement, MSC president David Spigelmyer criticized what he called “misguided and short-sighted” policies that would increase taxes and fees and threaten the industry’s future in Pennsylvania.

“This research further demonstrates that bad policy is bad politics,” Spigelmyer said.

The poll was conducted by Boston-based Anderson Robbins Research from June 6 through June 8. It follows an analysis by the left-leaning Pennsylvania Budget and Policy Center released on Monday calling for a five percent severance tax.

Using data from the state Department of Revenue, the PBPC claims that drillers paid modest corporate net income taxes as shale gas production has soared since 2008.

“Gas drillers do not have an onerous tax burden in Pennsylvania that should excuse them from paying a reasonable severance tax,” said executive director Sharon Ward in a statement.

StateImpact Pennsylvania partner witf has reported that a severance tax, once a nonstarter in the Republican-controlled legislature, is slowly gaining GOP support:

Some Republicans see a political benefit to passing an extraction tax. More moderate Republican Senate and House members, especially in the southeastern part of the state, see it as a way to score with their constituents. Other GOP members see it as a way to take some air out of Democrats’ sails. Tom Wolf, Governor Tom Corbett’s Democratic opponent in the general gubernatorial election, is campaigning on a spending platform that depends on an extraction tax.

Incumbent Governor Tom Corbett opposes a severance tax, arguing it would hinder the growth of the state’s booming natural gas industry. Rather, Corbett supports the current impact fee charged for every well drilled. The fee has generated $630 million in the last three years.


  • Tam

    That “additional taxes would force the industry out of Pennsylvania” is fine with me.
    Get out of our state, don’t encourage more but less use of fossil fuels and don’t fund education with dirty polluting gas money. The industry builds wells next to our schools! We being the watery state, choose our resource of income and jobs in sustainable energy resources and clean water. Together we can stop the toxic chemicals, the death to water and land, upheaval to families, our farms closing down and look forward with climate action to lower our reliance on fossil fuel, in a responsible and healthy fashion. Moratorium on gas production until a thorough environmental study is done and no more leases on day one Tom Wolf! Don’t give our state away to gas.

  • paulroden

    I am with you Tam. If taxing or regulating fracking forces the gas drillers to leave, that is exactly want I want all of them to do. Good riddance! We don’t need this methane. We don’t need the added carbon dioxide added to our atmosphere contributing to faster climate change. I am sick ad tired of the dirty energy industry and extractive industries removing our trees from our forests, minerals, coal, oil and now gas and leaving an environmental mess in their wake with us the taxpayer to take care of it all. We don’t need this gas for our energy needs. Besides if we closed the “Delaware Loophole” and companies like Wal-Mart paid their fair share of corporate taxes and we taxed cigars and other tobacco products, and restored the corporate tax cuts, we could balance the state budget. If corporations want to do business here, they should help pay for the use of the infrastructure and the education and training of their workers. There is no such thing as a free lunch. You can’t have something for nothing. If they balk at that, fine good riddance to the greedy, corporate welfare takers! They can go do business somewhere else and rip off that state or country and its workers. We want responsible corporate citizens, not corporations and companies who are greedy and selfish takers with no community or environmental responsibility.

  • Name

    This is a tax on the royalty owners not the gasco’s who will pass the tax in the form of a deduction per a majority of the leases that are signed. This will not cost the gasco’s much additional money, but the very few who are fortunate enough to get anything in a royalty after all the deductions already. Please don’t be misled.

About StateImpact

StateImpact seeks to inform and engage local communities with broadcast and online news focused on how state government decisions affect your lives.
Learn More »