{"id":35395,"date":"2022-12-01T19:48:58","date_gmt":"2022-12-02T01:48:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/oklahoma\/?p=35395"},"modified":"2022-12-01T23:16:17","modified_gmt":"2022-12-02T05:16:17","slug":"judge-oklahoma-turnpike-authority-violated-open-meeting-act-access-project-contracts-rendered-invalid","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/oklahoma\/2022\/12\/01\/judge-oklahoma-turnpike-authority-violated-open-meeting-act-access-project-contracts-rendered-invalid\/","title":{"rendered":"Judge: Oklahoma Turnpike Authority violated Open Meeting Act, ACCESS project contracts rendered invalid"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Oklahoma Turnpike Authority has lost the first of several impending court decisions regarding the 15-year, $5 billion ACCESS Oklahoma turnpike project.<\/span><\/p><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The lawsuit filed on behalf of over 200 central Oklahoma residents alleged the OTA willfully violated the state\u2019s Open Meeting Act by using vague language in its <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/pikepass.com\/pdf\/25January2022_Agenda.pdf\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Jan. 25<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> and <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/pikepass.com\/pdf\/February%2022%202022%20Agenda.pdf\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Feb. 22<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> public meeting agendas and documents leading up to the announcement of the ACCESS project.\u00a0<\/span><\/p><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.accessoklahoma.com\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">ACCESS Oklahoma<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> project was announced following the Feb. 22 OTA board meeting. The project would construct new turnpike extensions in Oklahoma and Cleveland Counties, some of which are estimated to <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.pikeoffota.com\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">force over 600 homeowners<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> out of their properties \u2014 though the OTA said this number is closer to 200.<\/span><\/p><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The decision invalidates the ACCESS-related actions taken during the meetings in question, which amounts to about $69 million in engineering contracts for the project. To get those contracts back, the OTA will need to redo the approval votes with the proper agenda requirements.<\/span><\/p><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Cleveland County District Court Judge Timothy Olsen wrote in his decision that while the OTA knew the specifics of the ACCESS project \u201cin great detail,\u201d the January and February meeting agendas contained nothing that referenced the plan as required by the Oklahoma Open Meeting Act.<\/span><\/p><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201cThe agenda items in question seem to be the opposite of what is required by the OMA,\u201d Olsen wrote. \u201cNo person of ordinary education and intelligence could know from the agendas that ACCESS Oklahoma was to be rolled out at the meeting and\/or even that the new turnpikes were being planned. The term \u2018certain turnpikes\u2019 is so vague that the use of the term in and of itself shows an intent to deceive the citizenry of Oklahoma.\u201d<\/span><\/p><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Norman City Councilor Rarchar Tortorello spoke at a press conference Thursday evening. His ward would be significantly impacted by the project.<\/span><\/p><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201cThis will force them to go back and redo those meetings,\u201d Tortorello said. \u201cAnd guess what? We will show up, and we will provide comment.\u201d<\/span><\/p><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">There are two other court decisions that are expected to come out this month \u2014 one from a lawsuit <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/oklahoma\/2022\/05\/04\/in-light-of-lawsuit-council-conditionally-approves-funds-for-oklahoma-turnpike-authority\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">challenging the OTA\u2019s interpretation of the law<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> that authorizes some of the project\u2019s routes, and another in which the <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.normantranscript.com\/news\/state-high-court-hears-arguments-in-ota-lawsuit\/article_5cc60fe8-6f7c-11ed-9baa-0bd2aa2e8407.html\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">state Supreme Court will decide<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> whether to validate bonds for the project.<\/span><\/p><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Opponents of the project are also looking to the legislature to help block the project. This summer, two legislative interim study sessions were held to explain the structure of the OTA and the arguments of the current lawsuits.\u00a0<\/span><\/p><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Plaintiff attorney Alexey Tarasov said at the press conference there would be a legislative effort to modify the state\u2019s eminent domain laws.<\/span><\/p><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201cWe\u2019ve proposed a constitutional amendment on eminent domain whereby if a turnpike project gets authorized or is about to be constructed, that there should be a vote of the citizens who reside in that area so that a majority would approve the project,\u201d Tarasov said.<\/span><\/p><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Reached for comment, the OTA provided a statement:\u00a0<\/span><\/p><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201cThe Oklahoma Turnpike Authority has always endeavored to conduct its statutory mission to construct, operate, repair and maintain turnpike projects in an open and transparent manner. We respect the Court\u2019s decision and will go about bringing new items of business, to correct what the Court found to be deficient, for the Authority Board\u2019s consideration.\u201d<\/span><\/p><p>&nbsp;<\/p><p><em>*This article was updated to correct the day of the press conference.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Oklahoma Turnpike Authority has lost the first of several impending court decisions regarding the 15-year, $5 billion ACCESS Oklahoma turnpike project.The lawsuit filed on behalf of over 200 central Oklahoma residents alleged the OTA willfully violated the state\u2019s Open Meeting Act by using vague language in its Jan. 25 and Feb. 22 public meeting [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":216,"featured_media":35244,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1459,1],"tags":[1396,1471,1395,1449],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/oklahoma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35395"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/oklahoma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/oklahoma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/oklahoma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/216"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/oklahoma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=35395"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/oklahoma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35395\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":35398,"href":"https:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/oklahoma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35395\/revisions\/35398"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/oklahoma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35244"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/oklahoma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=35395"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/oklahoma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=35395"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/oklahoma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=35395"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}