{"id":27554,"date":"2016-11-09T11:17:22","date_gmt":"2016-11-09T17:17:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/oklahoma\/?p=27554"},"modified":"2016-11-09T11:17:22","modified_gmt":"2016-11-09T17:17:22","slug":"oklahoma-voters-soundly-reject-state-question-to-constitutionally-protect-farming-and-ranching","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/oklahoma\/2016\/11\/09\/oklahoma-voters-soundly-reject-state-question-to-constitutionally-protect-farming-and-ranching\/","title":{"rendered":"Oklahoma Voters Soundly Reject State Question to Constitutionally Protect Farming and Ranching"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"Former<\/p>\n

Logan Layden \/ StateImpact Oklahoma<\/p>\n

Former Oklahoma Attorney General Drew Edmondson at the 'No on 777' watch party at Aloft Hotel in Oklahoma City.<\/p>\n<\/div>

Oklahoma voters on Tuesday rejected State Question 777 \u2014 known by supporters as the right-to-farm amendment. The final vote was 60-40 against the measure, which would\u2019ve elevated farming and ranching to a constitutional right.<\/p>

The \u2018Yes on 777\u2019 coalition raised more money, earlier, and polling showed a race in flux<\/a> weeks before the vote. Even former Oklahoma Attorney General Drew Edmondson, one of the strongest voices against the ballot question, admitted he was surprised the measure was voted down by such a large margin.<\/p>

\u201cI was very pleasantly surprised that undecideds broke our way and we had a significant, textbook landslide victory,\u201d Edmondson said from the \u2018No on 777\u2019 watch party after the result was clear. \u201cIt was huge, and we appreciate the voters taking a look at it and casting a very smart vote.\u201d<\/p>

Edmondson says the Oklahoma Stewardship Council \u2014 one of the coalitions pushing against State Question 777 \u2014 had an uphill climb to educate the public about the dangers of right-to-farm, but was able to convince Oklahoma Voters to reject it.<\/p>

\u201cNewspapers across the state of Oklahoma were clear on it. Advocates were clear on it. The Conference of Churches, across the board. And it was not just urban versus rural. We had support from rural, as well as urban area,\u201d Edmondson said.<\/p>

The proposed state question would have added language to the state constitution designed to prevent lawmakers from enacting legislation limiting agricultural technology, livestock production or ranching practices absent a compelling state interest. Had voters approved 777, Oklahoma would have been the third state<\/a> to adopt such agricultural protections, behind Missouri and North Dakota.<\/p>

The measure received vocal support from individual farmers and industry groups<\/a>, and raised more than $1.3 million in donations through September, state campaign data show. Opponents, however, had nearly closed the 2016 fundraising gap in the weeks before Election Day.<\/p>

Oklahoma Farm Bureau President Tom Buchanan, a leading organizer in favor of 777, says despite the loss, the fight to protect farmers from over-regulation will continue.<\/p>

\u201cIt\u2019s not the end of right-to-farm,\u201d Buchanan said from a watch party in Oklahoma City. \u201cWe\u2019re gonna be here forever. We\u2019re gonna keep doing this. We are the backbone of Oklahoma. We are your neighbors. We\u2019ll be here.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Oklahoma voters on Tuesday rejected State Question 777 \u2014 known by supporters as the right-to-farm amendment. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":42,"featured_media":27558,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[491],"tags":[313,637],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/oklahoma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27554"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/oklahoma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/oklahoma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/oklahoma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/42"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/oklahoma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=27554"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/oklahoma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27554\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":27562,"href":"https:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/oklahoma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27554\/revisions\/27562"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/oklahoma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/27558"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/oklahoma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=27554"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/oklahoma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=27554"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/oklahoma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=27554"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}