{"id":22039,"date":"2014-12-03T16:20:20","date_gmt":"2014-12-03T22:20:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/oklahoma\/?p=22039"},"modified":"2014-12-03T19:20:43","modified_gmt":"2014-12-04T01:20:43","slug":"environmentalists-regional-haze-ruling-in-texas-means-cleaner-air-in-oklahoma","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/oklahoma\/2014\/12\/03\/environmentalists-regional-haze-ruling-in-texas-means-cleaner-air-in-oklahoma\/","title":{"rendered":"Environmentalists: Regional Haze Ruling in Texas Means Cleaner Air in Oklahoma"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"attachment_15928\"  class=\"wp-caption module image right\" style=\"max-width: 620px;\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-full wp-image-15928\" alt=\"Oklahoma Gas & Electric's coal-fired Sooner Plant near Red Rock, Okla.\" src=\"http:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/oklahoma\/files\/2013\/05\/sooner-plant1.jpg\" width=\"620\" height=\"413\" srcset=\"https:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/oklahoma\/files\/2013\/05\/sooner-plant1.jpg 620w, https:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/oklahoma\/files\/2013\/05\/sooner-plant1-500x333.jpg 500w, https:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/oklahoma\/files\/2013\/05\/sooner-plant1-150x100.jpg 150w, https:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/oklahoma\/files\/2013\/05\/sooner-plant1-300x200.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 620px) 100vw, 620px\" \/><\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-media-credit\">Joe Wertz \/ StateImpact Oklahoma<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-caption-text\">Oklahoma Gas & Electric&#39;s coal-fired Sooner Plant near Red Rock, Okla.<\/p>\n<\/div><p>On Nov. 24, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency <a title=\"StateImpactLink\" href=\"http:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/oklahoma\/2014\/11\/24\/epa-rejects-texas-plan-to-reduce-haze-at-oklahoma-wildlife-refuge\/\" target=\"_blank\">announced its determination<\/a> that Texas\u2019 plan to reduce haze-causing emissions from its coal-fired power plants wouldn\u2019t do enough to clear the air at national parks and wildlife refuges, including the Wichita National Wildlife Refuge in southwest Oklahoma.<\/p><p>Instead, the EPA will set the standards, which will likely force some plants to switch to natural gas or install expensive air scrubbers. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality didn\u2019t take the news well, saying the EPA\u2019s requirements would cost electricity customers billions of dollars for \u201ca negligible increase in visibility.\u201d<!--more--><\/p><p>Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt and Oklahoma Gas & Electric \u2014 the state\u2019s largest utility \u2014 <a title=\"StateImpactLink\" href=\"http:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/oklahoma\/2014\/05\/27\/u-s-supreme-court-wont-hear-attorney-generals-challenge-to-federal-haze-rule\/\" target=\"_blank\">fought the EPA hard<\/a> when it made a similar determination about Oklahoma\u2019s regional haze plan in 2013, before the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear Pruitt\u2019s case. Pruitt calls the regional haze rule an example of federal overreach that, as he told StateImpact in an email in May, \u201cplaces the states in an inferior position to EPA\u2019s command and control approach\u2026\u201d<\/p><p>OG&E has said the cost of upgrading coal plants or switching them to natural gas would be passed on to utility customers, but better air quality and the restoration of unspoiled views of majestic landscapes don&#8217;t have to be bought with higher prices for electricity, according to Emily Rosenwasser with the Sierra Club&#8217;s Beyond Coal Campaign, because &#8220;recent history has shown that Oklahoma regional haze action phasing out coal is going to save customers money with lower cost wind power,&#8221; Rosenwasser says in an email to StateImpact.<\/p><p>Texas Sierra Club Interim Director Cyrus Reed:<\/p><p>\u201cUnfortunately, in Texas, our coal plants emit more pollution than coal plants from any other state,\u201d Cyrus Reed, with the Sierra Club in Texas, says. \u201cAnd that pollution can create haze \u2014 which is mainly from sulfur dioxide emissions \u2014 at some of our most iconic national treasures, like Big Bend National Park and the Guadalupe Mountains here in Texas, but also our friends in Oklahoma and Arkansas, affecting their wilderness, too.\u201d<\/p><p>Reed led a tele-press conference on Wednesday to throw Texas Sierra Club\u2019s support behind the EPA\u2019s decision, during which Angela Bolds, who leads hikes from in the Wichita Mountain and volunteers at the visitor center, talked about the reduction in visibility she\u2019s seen over her nearly 40 years living in the area.<\/p><p>\u201cMore and more visitors to the Wichita Mountains comment on \u2014 just to quote one \u2014 \u2018that funny looking haze,\u2019\u201d Bolds said. \u201cOver the years I have noticed a frightening change in the air quality impacting our wildlife refuge. And I also began to hear stories from people who grew up around the Wichita Mountains during times of cleaner air. And when these people returned to visit decades later, they were appalled by the changes in air quality.\u201d<\/p><p>Reed, with the Sierra Club, says the second half of 2014 really has been the season of new EPA regulations, with the Texas regional haze ruling, <a title=\"StateImpactLink\" href=\"http:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/oklahoma\/2014\/12\/01\/state-regulators-stricter-ozone-standard-would-be-hard-for-oklahoma-to-meet\/\" target=\"_blank\">new ozone standards<\/a> being proposed, and the announcement of President Obama\u2019s <a title=\"EPAlink\" href=\"http:\/\/www2.epa.gov\/carbon-pollution-standards\/clean-power-plan-proposed-rule\" target=\"_blank\">Clean Power Plan<\/a>, but that states can all but kill each of these birds with one stone: complying with the regional haze rule by replacing coal with renewables.<\/p><p>\u201cIf we were to replace these 14 coal boilers [identified in Texas by the EPA] with clean energy, we\u2019d get two-thirds of the way to meeting the EPA\u2019s target for reducing carbon emissions from Texas,\u201d Reed says.<\/p><p><em>Clarification: An earlier version of this story implied Texas Sierra Club&#8217;s Cyrus Reed accepts that the cost of upgrading coal plants will mean higher prices for utility customers. In fact, Reed&#8217;s position is that moving away from coal is the best thing for not only\u00a0the air, but consumers as well.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality didn\u2019t take the news well, saying the EPA\u2019s requirements would cost electricity customers billions of dollars for \u201ca negligible increase in visibility.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":42,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[491],"tags":[553,554,499,552],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/oklahoma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22039"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/oklahoma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/oklahoma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/oklahoma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/42"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/oklahoma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=22039"}],"version-history":[{"count":20,"href":"https:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/oklahoma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22039\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":22073,"href":"https:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/oklahoma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22039\/revisions\/22073"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/oklahoma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=22039"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/oklahoma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=22039"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/oklahoma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=22039"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}