Eye on Education


green and red apples

Ohio's Teacher Evaluation System


By the start of the 2013–14 school year, Ohio public school districts must adopt new ways of evaluating teachers. Charter schools that get federal Race to the Top funds must do the same.

Ohio’s state Board of Education approved the framework for this new evaluation system in November 2011.

The big differences between this new system and old one include:

    • Old system: In general, teacher evaluations were mostly based on a principal or other administrator observing a teacher at work and grading them. Most teachers received a “satisfactory” rating; a few are rated “unsatisfactory.”

GTT logo-resize
Click here to learn more about valued-added, a new way that Ohio is using to measure whether teachers provide a year’s worth of learning to their students.
  • New system: Half a teacher’s evaluation is based on an observation, but observers are supposed to grade teachers against a specific set of criteria. The other half is based on how much their students learn over the course of the year. (For some teachers, a controversial measure called “value-added” is used.) The observation and test-score measures are combined to give teachers one of four possible grades, from top to bottom: Accomplished, skilled  developing, ineffective.
  • Old system: Most teachers are evaluated every few years.
  • New system: All but the top-rated teachers must be evaluated annually.
  • Old system: Few schools used teacher evaluation results in deciding where to place teachers or whether to lay them of or give them raises.
  • New system: Local boards of education must adopt policies about how they’ll use evaluation results for promotion and termination decisions. Seniority can not be the basis for teacher retention decisions, except when deciding between teachers who have comparable evaluations.

Why are these changes happening?

Several reasons:

  • A 2009 law said the state’s Educator Standards Board should develop a new and improved way to evaluate Ohio teachers.
  • The 2011 state budget required the state Board of Education to approve an evaluation-system outline by the end of 2011. The budget said at least 50 percent of a teacher’s evaluation must be based on student academic growth. And it said the evaluation system must also be aligned with the state’s expectations for teachers, require at least two observations of a teacher, and meet other requirements.
  • Evaluations are also one part of the reason Ohio school districts got part of $400 million in Race to the Top funds. To receive the federal stimulus money, states had to promise that schools would adopt teacher (and principal) evaluation systems that “differentiate effectiveness using multiple rating categories that take into account data on student growth…as a significant factor, and…are designed and developed with teacher and principal involvement.”
  • And to get a waiver from some parts of the No Child Left Behind Act, Ohio had to commit to using a teacher evaluation system that, unsurprisingly, offers more than one rating for teachers, takes student growth (and other measures) into account, and is used to “inform personnel decisions.”

Latest Posts

Grading the Teachers: Teachers in Richer Schools Score Higher on Value-Added Measure

16CGVALUE B.indd

Value-added was supposed to be the great equalizer — a measure of schools that would finally judge fairly how much poor students are learning compared with their wealthier peers. Meant to gauge whether students learn as much as expected in a given year, value-added will become a key part of rating individual teachers from rich [...]

Grading the Teachers: Little Connection Between Teacher Pay and Performance

Ray Fatur, who has been teaching for 19 years, says paying experienced teachers more just make sense.

There is little connection between how much money Ohio teachers make and how much knowledge they impart to students over the course of a single year, according to a StateImpact Ohio/Plain Dealer analysis of a new measure of teacher performance. In fact, that analysis of state data shows that within many school districts, teachers who [...]

Grading the Teachers: Stories on Value-Added Starting Sunday

GTT logo

Ohio is introducing a new way of grading teachers, one based on student test scores and whether students learn as much as expected in a given year. It uses a measure called value-added. Starting Sunday, StateImpact Ohio and the Cleveland Plain Dealer will launch a series of stories about value-added:

Ohio Teachers Could Strike Over State’s New Teacher Evaluation System

Teachers in Strongsville reached a settlement in May after an eight-week strike.

Teachers in the Beaver school district in eastern Ohio could strike at the beginning of the coming school year in part over a disagreement about how teachers should be evaluated, the Morning Journal reports. Currently, most Ohio teachers’ job evaluations are based on a principal observing their classrooms. But state law requires schools to change [...]

Fordham: This Ed Reform Thing Could Blow Up in Our Face


Ohio schools aren’t ready for major changes the state has mandated, according to the results of a survey of superintendents conducted by the Thomas B. Fordham Institute. And the rapid pace of school reform may mean Ohio policymakers risk the failure of ambitious efforts to improve schools if the pace doesn’t slow, said Fordham’s Terry [...]

How Ohio’s New Teacher Evaluations Will Change Student Teaching

Ohio’s educators have been nervously watching the development of a new way to evaluate teachers. They’re nervous because half of their evaluations will be based on student test scores. Officials hope the higher stakes will improve teaching performance. But there could be ripple effects, like big changes in the way student teachers get classroom experience.

About StateImpact

StateImpact seeks to inform and engage local communities with broadcast and online news focused on how state government decisions affect your lives.
Learn More »