Eye on Education

Poverty Dilutes Spending Power of Ohio’s Urban, Rural School Districts

dollar puzzle

SalFalko / Flickr

On paper, an urban school district like Cleveland Metropolitan Schools spends more money per student than a suburban one like Bexley City Schools outside Columbus.

But adjust that spending to account for the number of special education students, English Language Learners, and kids from impoverished households each district serves, and the amount leftover for basic education needs drops by $4000 in Cleveland, and only $1500 in Bexley.

“Pupils of each of those types are going to require more resources to educate them than your typical pupil will be,” says Howard Fleeter, a consultant with the Education Tax Policy Institute.

In his report “Apples to Apples: Ohio School District Expenditures Per Equivalent Pupil,” Fleeter concluded urban and rural districts that serve high needs populations are stretching their dollars much further than their counterparts that have wealthier populations.

Listen to the radio story here

Fleeter analyzed and compared per student spending across Ohio’s school systems.  Then he adjusted that spending to account for the number of special ed students and kids in poverty each district serves.

The result: 30-40 percent of per student spending in urban districts goes toward special services like free lunch programs, special learning equipment, and translation materials. Rural districts spend 20-25 percent of their dollars on those services.  And suburban systems spend about 14 percent.

The adjustment, he says, could give Ohioans a different perspective on the tax money they pay for their local school district.

“If you’re a tax payer in Cleveland Heights, and you’re wondering why are my taxes so high, look at what I spend, it’s about the same as Beachwood, it’s about the same as Orange. Why when I get my report card we’re not doing as well, it’s because the costs that Cleveland Heights faces to educate its population of students is higher than in those other districts.”

Fleeter says legislators might want to consider his study when developing the next school funding formula.  Data from the Ohio Department of Education show the percent of Ohio students living in poverty has increased 50 percent in the past ten years.


  • Carol Ann

    So, whose paying the public school funding bill in Ohio public school districts?
    In Pennsylvania, so-called property owners, mostly home owners, are paying the majority of the cost through a school property tax.
    Pa’s public school funding system began 170+ yr ago when the only people with money were property owners. In rural districts, the entire community would erect a one-room schoolhouse and teacher’s home. They’d collectively take care of the teacher(s).
    Over the decades, it never occurred to anyone that authorizing the local school board to levy property taxes might hurt anyone.
    In the early 1960s, the average school property tax was still under $15.00/month but, today, the average costs homeowners $300./month with eviction, bankruptcy, and homelessness as the punishment for nonpayment.
    Learn all about it via http://www.ptcc.us

About StateImpact

StateImpact seeks to inform and engage local communities with broadcast and online news focused on how state government decisions affect your lives.
Learn More »