{"id":6055,"date":"2012-02-09T12:12:52","date_gmt":"2012-02-09T17:12:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/new-hampshire\/?p=6055"},"modified":"2012-02-09T12:13:15","modified_gmt":"2012-02-09T17:13:15","slug":"three-things-to-expect-at-todays-right-to-work-hearing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/new-hampshire\/2012\/02\/09\/three-things-to-expect-at-todays-right-to-work-hearing\/","title":{"rendered":"Three Things To Expect At Today’s Right-To-Work Hearing"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>

NHPR<\/p>

Last session, Right To Work proved to be highly controversial. This session, it looks like more of the same.<\/p><\/div>\n

The House Labor, Industrial and Rehabilitative Services Committee has already heard a number of controversial bills targeting collective bargaining<\/a>.\u00a0 And unions have responded in force.\u00a0 This afternoon, tensions promise to be particularly high between Republicans and organized labor as the committee holds a public hearing on the resurrected so-called “Right To Work” legislation<\/a>.<\/p>\n

We’ll be liveblogging the event from the House Chamber when it starts at 1:30 this afternoon.<\/p>\n

But before we go, we checked in with NHPR’s Political Reporter Josh Rogers about what you can expect from the hearing this time around.\u00a0 <\/p>\n

    \n
  1. It’ll be packed with people in general–and union people in particular:\u00a0 <\/strong>Organized labor’s been turning out religiously–and en masse–for other collective bargaining bill hearings this session.\u00a0 The only reason the Granite State’s not a Right To Work state right now is the fact that Governor Lynch vetoed the bill, and House Speaker Bill O’Brien couldn’t muster up enough votes to overturn it.\u00a0 The House Chamber is also big<\/em> (after all, during floor votes, it holds up to 400 Representatives).\u00a0 So if the committee’s holding the hearing there, they’re expecting a big<\/em> crowd.\u00a0 And, Rogers tells us, “For every guy who stands up and testifies in favor, at least ten union people will get up and talk.”<\/li>\n
  2. We’ve seen this new version of Right To Work before: <\/strong>Last session, the House passed a standard-issue RTW law<\/a>, then amended it to fit a more libertarian mindset:\u00a0Employees wouldn’t be required to pay any fees or dues to unions, but unions <\/em>wouldn’t have to represent non-union employees, either.\u00a0 But there were a number of concerns about this second half of the bill actually violating federal labor laws.\u00a0 The Senate ended up scrubbing that part of the bill, and passed regular Right To Work legislation.\u00a0 Which the governor vetoed.\u00a0 HB 1677<\/a> is more in line with the amended legislation the House passed last year.<\/li>\n
  3. Right To Work supporters in the House will stress the difference between the bills: <\/strong>Right To Work has been hugely controversial in New Hampshire.\u00a0 So you can expect some supporters to point out that this particular piece of legislation doesn’t just insulate employees from unsolicited union influence, it also saves unions the costs of representing uninterested workers who want to cut their own deals with management.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    The House Labor, Industrial and Rehabilitative Services Committee has already heard a number of controversial bills targeting collective bargaining.\u00a0 And unions have responded in force.\u00a0 This afternoon, tensions promise to be particularly high between Republicans and organized labor as the committee holds a public hearing on the resurrected so-called “Right To Work” legislation. We’ll be […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":28,"featured_media":6059,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[53],"tags":[513,555],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/new-hampshire\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6055"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/new-hampshire\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/new-hampshire\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/new-hampshire\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/28"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/new-hampshire\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6055"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/new-hampshire\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6055\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6063,"href":"https:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/new-hampshire\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6055\/revisions\/6063"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/new-hampshire\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/6059"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/new-hampshire\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6055"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/new-hampshire\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6055"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateimpact.npr.org\/new-hampshire\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6055"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}