Reddit Commenters Debate: Did Texas Deserve the Drought?

Photo by Wyman Meinzer/Texas Monthly

The bacteria Chromatiaceae grows in oxygen-deprived water. It turned Croton Creek, a tributary of the Brazos, eerily red during the 2011 drought.

Our story on how the drought killed over 300 million trees in Texas got picked up by the social news site Reddit today. And it didn’t take long for one commenter to pose the question: Maybe Texas was asking for it?

“Couldn’t happen to a more deserving state,” Reddit user quelar wrote. “Perhaps this may change some peoples minds about the dangers of global warming. But I know it won’t.”

The idea that Texas deserved the drought because of state officials that deny climate change (starting with the governor) and industry-friendly policies is no doubt offensive to a wide variety of people in the state. And turns out it’s offensive to many in the Reddit community, too.

RjoTTU0bio writes that he thinks the drought has forced many Texans to confront the reality of climate change: “As a Texan with a brother in Austin, parents in Houston, a girlfriend in Dallas, and that attends a college in Lubbock, I have seen it all. I witnessed the buffalo bayou drying up in west Houston, the dust storms in the plains, the drying up of lake Travis in Austin/Marble Falls, the yellowing of yards in the suburbs, and the fires (some controlled) that hit central and north Texas.”

“At one point I was driving from Lubbock to Dallas on 114, and as far as you could see to the south was dead burnt trees, and live trees to the north,” he continues. “I think the climate change skepticism is diminishing here in everyone other than the big oil employees.”

Jackson3135 concurs:

“I came in here for actual conversation and found only Texas bashing instead. Wow. Way to go, guys. You should feel proud of yourselves.

… Don’t come in here and say that you hope MY state, and the state where literally MILLIONS of people vote left, turns into an environmental s%*# hole, or that somehow every Texan is to blame for the right wing and is deserving of their policies’ resulting consequences.”

saktiDC backs that up:

“100% with you. I can’t believe people would go that direction with this. Climate change effects everyone, and Texas is on the front lines. Stay liberal Jackson! We’ll make Texas a swing state yet :)

But not everyone in the forum is against the idea that Texas, in a way, had this coming. cryptoz writes:

“Texas governor Rick Perry has chosen to pray for rain rather than do anything to address the actual problem. While I would never wish harm on people, it is interesting to see the people of Texas vote for politicians who are willfully ignorant of what a drought is and how it works. They definitely deserve what they get.”

And we’ll leave you with MoreBeansAndRice‘s response to that:

“Unless Rick Perry controls ENSO (La Nina was the primary driver of this drought) then I pretty sure that voting for him has nothing to do with the weather or climate.”

Comments

  • http://www.facebook.com/nancy.el2 Nancy El

    I lived through the 7 year drought in the 1950′s. this drought was long overdue and probably had as much to do with the huge influx of people seeking jobs in Texas..as anything.. maybe we should not allow more people to move into the state than we have water to support..

  • lily913

    What a bunch of idiots!!! Why would we deserve a drought for people not recognizing climate change???!!! Texas has always been preetty dry(well since i can remember),Except for a few winters or in the spring time. It was in the cards for Texas,after all,fires&everything dying is a way for the natural process of renewal to take place. Without loss,there can be no gain. Hopefully this person who said “Texas deseved The drought” will get a dose of his/her own medicine&some bad natural disaster will strike on their home or state!

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1016947792 Douglas Moore

      Absolutely right Lily! From global cooling to global warming to (hedging their bets) climate change. This is natural and man has nothing to do with it. The so-called progressives need to stop being such a hindrance. Don’t sound to progressive to me. Maybe they have bubbles in their think tank. Idgits!

  • http://twitter.com/intrstngtimes Interesting Times

    Why can’t people see the BIG PICTURE? Fossil-fueled climate chaos has many impacts, and the absurd accusation above about “hedging bets” completely fails to take this into account. For example, as ARCTIC ICE MELTS, it affects ocean currents and the jet stream, which in turn fuels extreme weather events like the 2012 drought and heat wave – Record Arctic Snow Loss May Be Prolonging North American Drought
    - (over not just Texas but two-thirds of the continental US) and the brutal winter earlier this year in Europe (yes, deniers, global warming that melts polar ice can bring exceptionally cold weather to places that normally don’t have it, as NASA correctly predicted in 2004 – A Chilling Possibility – NASA Science)

    Bottom line, as CO2 from fossil-fuel burning traps heat, melts polar ice, and heats and acidifies oceans, it’s going to result in more and more extreme weather patterns, extreme weather we otherwise would not be getting: NASA’s Hansen: Would recent extreme “events have occurred if atmospheric carbon dioxide had remained at its pre-industrial level of 280 ppm?” The “appropriate answer” is “almost certainly not.”

    And for James Hansen haters, take a good, long look at this chart – it’s his predictions vs a climate change denier vs reality. Who actually got it right?

    http://www.skepticalscience.com/graphics/Hansen_vs_Lindzen_1024.jpg (from the article at http://www.skepticalscience.com/news.php?p=2&t=59&&n=739 )

About StateImpact

StateImpact seeks to inform and engage local communities with broadcast and online news focused on how state government decisions affect your lives.
Learn More »

Education