Pennsylvania

Energy. Environment. Economy.

Scientific Panel Will Examine Public Concerns Related To Shale Gas Drilling

Scott Detrow/ StateImpact Pennsylvania

A natural gas drill rig in Tioga State Forest.

The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reports a National Academy of Sciences committee will convene next week to scrutinize public concerns and potential risks of shale gas drilling.

The panel will examine a number of topics including air, water, and climate concerns, but they will not issue specific recommendations, according to the Post-Gazette:

“This review will be successful if the current state of knowledge about shale gas drilling is clarified and the uncertainties identified so we have better understanding and insights to help manage the risks,” said Mitchell Small, the NAS committee chair and Carnegie Mellon University professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. He will moderate a discussion this morning on a survey of concerns about lesser-studied drilling issues including impacts on rural quality of life, domestic animals, industry transparency and social justice.

Paul Stern, director of the review and senior scholar with the academy’s Board on Environmental Change and Society, said the review’s goal is to pull together the best available information for use by national and state policymakers.

Water quality concerns have been repeatedly raised during Pennsylvania’s gas drilling boom, and particularly this week, after the Scranton Times-Tribune published an analysis of nearly 1,000 enforcement letters from the state Department of Environmental Protection between 2008 and 2012:

One in six investigations across the roughly five-year period – 17 percent of the records – found that oil and gas activity disrupted water supplies either temporarily or seriously enough to require companies to replace the spoiled source.

The Times Tribune found oil and gas development damaged water supplies for at least 161 properties in Pennsylvania.

The NAS committee meeting will be held next Thursday and Friday in Washington D.C.

Comments

  • john slesinger

    the one in six investigation numbers do not take into account “investigations” claimed to have no merit because the DEP chose to ignore their own documents proving the connection between drilling and water contamination. and they will not address the specific problem of poor monitoring and lack of real investigations causing those numbers to be under reported. So this comittee might as well conduct a review of something more realistic like the amount of ice cream in an ice cream cone. Just another comittee that will make a show and do nothing.

About StateImpact

StateImpact seeks to inform and engage local communities with broadcast and online news focused on how state government decisions affect your lives.
Learn More »

Economy
Education