Pennsylvania

Energy. Environment. Economy.

Obama Backs Fracking During Campaign Appearance

Getty Images

President Obama, at the White House

President Obama says Americans “should welcome” the shale drilling boom that has lead to increased domestic oil and gas production, according to the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. The Democrat’s caveat – he supports drilling  as long as it’s done “safely and in a way that’s environmentally sound.”

The President made the drilling comments in Cincinnati yesterday, answering an audience member’s question about hydraulic fracturing:

“Natural gas actually burns cleaner than some other fossil fuels,” the Democratic incumbent said in reply to an audience question. “It’s an ideal energy source that we potentially could use for the next 100 years.

“So I want to encourage natural gas production. The key is to make sure that we do it safely and in a way that is environmentally sound.”

The practice popularly called “fracking,” regionally concentrated so far in eastern Ohio and neighboring Pennsylvania, involves ground injections of chemically treated fluids at high pressure to fracture shale deposits and free oil and natural gas trapped inside.

“There are a lot of folks right now who are engaging in hydraulic fracturing who are doing it safely,” Mr. Obama said. “The problem is that we haven’t established clear guidelines of how to do it safely and to inform the public, so that neighbors know what’s going on. … Look, we are going to work with industry to establish best practices. We are going to invest in the basic research and science to make sure this is done safely and in a way that protects the public health.

Comments

  • http://twitter.com/Fractivista Liz Rosenbaum

    Boooo! “We need to develop a real, meaningful energy policy, not all of the above. That’s no policy at all.” ~ Deborah Goldberg, Managing Attorney, EarthJustice

  • http://www.facebook.com/dorothea.poggi.5 Dorothea Poggi

    If you make the Frackin industry adhere to the clean water act etc. the Gas would cost more and solar would have a better chance of competing….filtration and reusing of the same potable water on site is costly….
    The fact that the industry was allowed to bulldoze ahead with very little environmental restrictions is what made the gas prices plummet and the solar energy fall behind…
    who is to say how much these industries get for disposing of unwanted chemicals generated by other industries into our ground and calling it a “Secret formula?”….who is to say that the profit from Hydro Frackin may include toxic waste disposal that is allowed by waving the normal laws that prevent disposable of chemicals near or around farming, people, animals, watersheds, streams, lakes etc.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Steven-Hales/1055705660 Steven Hales

    Invest in, make sure of, environmentally sound, inform your neighbors…Just the buzzwords of a jealous federal government.  We didn’t build it so we have to control it, regulate it, constrain, collectivize it and on and on.  Pathetic.

  • Nancy

    GOING TO?? I think that before we began doing this we should have made sure it was environmentally safe.  SO STUPID!!!!!!!!!!

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100002104101344 Rob Coyle

    Mr. President, they already started these operations and finding ways to bypass the already inadequate safety standards. this is, to borrow a quote from a recent advertisement, “like checkin on your burgers after they’re burnt”.

About StateImpact

StateImpact seeks to inform and engage local communities with broadcast and online news focused on how state government decisions affect your lives.
Learn More »

Education