Reuters: Big Biofuel Critic Inhofe Earmarks Funds for Oklahoma Renewable Fuel Co.

Brendan Hoffman / Getty Images

Sen. Jim Inhofe, R-Oklahoma

Oklahoma Sen. Jim Inhofe has led criticism against U.S. military spending on biofuels.

A recent “Green Fleet” Navy exercise, the Republican lawmaker charged, was an expensive waste of money and a publicity stunt for President Obama’s environmental agenda. And in May, he pushed a provision preventing the Pentagon from buying alternative fuels if they were more expensive than petroleum fuels.

But while he’s criticized such spending on biofuels, Inhofe helped secure $10 million in military funding to test such fuels, Reuters reports:

More than half of those earmarked funds, $5.95 million, went to a company in his home state of Oklahoma.

Tulsa’s Syntroleum has used federal funds to “test and develop” renewable fuels, Reuters’ reporter Marcus Stern reports. The company received $5.95 million in Pentagon contracts thanks to Inhofe earmarks in defense-spending bills in 2002, 2004 and 2005, Reuters reports. And in 2006, the company received an Air Force contract for $2.3 million for 104,000 gallons of fuel. “That equals about $22 a gallon,” Stern writes.

Part of Inhofe’s “outrage” over the Navy’s Green Fleet demonstration was the $26-per-gallon fuel. Reuters:

But in criticizing the “Green Fleet” project, Inhofe, it turns out, was opposing a program that benefited the very same Oklahoma renewable fuels company to which he had steered millions in funding. A Syntroleum joint venture was the fuel supplier to “Green Fleet.”

The difference, Infhofe says, is where the funding comes from. According to Reuters, Inhofe says the Syntroleum funding came from the “research and development account,” while money for the Green Fleet demonstration came from the Navy’s “operations and maintenance account.”

Comments

  • Cl1ffClav3n

    Slow learning is better than no learning. If only our Congressmen and appointed leaders read science like they read campaign donors. The German National Academy of Sciences just released the results of a 3-year study on biofuels and their report recommends that Europe abandon biofuels–for the sake of the environment, for the sake of global warming, and for the sake of sustainable energy. If you are a taxpayer and not living by government grants, or if you actually care about the environment, then read this. It was not written by Republicans or Democrats, but by German scientists in the country that has been the most progressive in all forms of alternative energy. It’s in English (Bioenergy – Chances and Limits. Nationale Akademie der Wissenschaften – Leopoldina, 2012. http://www.leopoldina.org/en/publications/detailview/?publicationpublication=433 ).

About StateImpact

StateImpact seeks to inform and engage local communities with broadcast and online news focused on how state government decisions affect your lives.
Learn More »

Education