Ohio

Eye on Education

Bullying Gut Check: Is It Really an Epidemic?

Ida Lieszkovszky / StateImpact Ohio

First-grader Erica Geisey was a favorite target of bullies until her school adopted a new anti-bullying technique: empowering students to be kind to their bullies. Geisey says it's hard, but for the most part it's working.

It seems like bullying is in the news constantly these days, from documentaries focusing on the problem in schools to news reports of victims committing suicide or shooting their classmates.

But is bullying really the epidemic some describe it to be?

When news of the shootings at Chardon High School in Northeast Ohio first broke this past spring, the immediate consensus was that the shooter must have been a victim retaliating. But, it’s not that simple. In this case it wasn’t bullying; it was mental illness.

And then there’s “Bully” the movie that includes the story of a victim who committed suicide. The American Suicide Prevention Foundation issued a release criticizing the film for assuming too strong a correlation between bullying and suicide, a relationship the foundation says hasn’t been supported by research.

It’s this sort of crying wolf, or in this case crying bully that worries Israel Kalman, a former school psychologist and founder of the Bullies 2 Buddies program. He says it’s not just the extreme behavior like school shootings that gets labeled as bullying these days, more often it’s the little things on the other end of the spectrum.

“The current definition of bullying really boils down to all negative behavior. Anything that you do that can upset another person is bullying.”

–Israel Kalman, Founder of Bullies 2 Buddies

“The current definition of bullying really boils down to all negative behavior,” Kalman says. “Anything that you do that can upset another person is bullying.”

The traditional definition of bullying comes with three check boxes: there must be some harm done to the victim, there is a power imbalance between the two parties, and it has to be a repetitive problem.

Bullying used to mean all three boxes were checked, but these days Kalman says just one of those components is enough for educators and parents to cry, “bully.”

“If you say something stupid and I roll my eyes, I’m bullying you and it’s now the teacher’s responsibility to make sure that children don’t roll their eyes,” says Kalman.

Okay, maybe kids can still get away with eye rolling, but Kalman says it feels like bullying is an epidemic because people are talking about it more, not because it’s actually happening more.

Ida Lieszkovszky / StateImpact Ohio

Kristyn Singleton of JFK Catholic School in Warren says bullying does happen in her school, but she says some parents also tend to be overprotective of their children.

Kristyn Singleton, director of curriculum at John F. Kennedy Catholic School in Warren, agrees.

She says it’s not unusual for parents to come in to the school complaining of another student who dislikes their child, and demanding that the school do something about it.

Singleton says she thinks bullying has always existed, “but I think that as a society we’ve become so politically correct and I think as parents we really take things to heart.”

But all that’s not to say bullying doesn’t happen.

Amid all the misdiagnoses, bullying is still very much a problem in schools and haunts many students daily.

What schools usually do is punish the accused bully, but in the case of JFK Catholic, it recently switched to a different technique: the Bullies 2 Buddies approach of encouraging kids to resolve their conflicts by being kind to classmates who are mean to them. Sound familiar? It’s inspired by the “Golden Rule.”

Singelton says this year in particular there was a group of first-grade girls who’ve struggled with bullying.

Seven-year old Erica Giesey has been a favorite target. She says the other girls don’t really say “mean words, but they kinda say like ‘I don’t like you’ and this and that.”

Usually Geisey’s response is something along the lines of “it’s okay.” As in, it’s okay if you don’t like me. She’s been taught to try to diffuse her bullies by joking with them and loving them – if she can.

It’s not easy.

She says she’s going to counseling, where they tell her not to let it bother her. “But it kind of does,” she confesses.

Geisey may never learn to love her bullies, and who can blame her? But she says things are getting better.

In December, before the school changed its anti-bullying program from one that focuses on punishing bullies to one that tries to empower victims, there were seven bullying-related discipline referrals to the principal’s office. Since January, there have been two.

In fact, according to the National Center for Education Statistics, the number of students nationwide who reported being afraid of an attack at school dropped from 12 percent in 1995 to 4 percent in 2009.

Christine Bhat, an assistant professor and bullying expert at Ohio University doesn’t buy that data.

“Much of the bullying that happens through the use of technology or relational bullying does fly under the radar.”

–Christine Bhat, Assistant Professor at Ohio University

“Much of the bullying that happens through the use of technology or relational bullying does fly under the radar.”

Bhat says there may be fewer playground fights breaking out, but that doesn’t mean kids are nicer to each other. They’ve just moved those attacks online.

Bhat suggests the best way to cut down on bullying is to teach children when they’re young about what’s wrong, and what’s right, and that what’s wrong in person is just as wrong online.

 

Clarification: A line at the beginning of this story about T.J. Lane, the shooter at Chardon High School states that he was not motivated by bullying but rather suffers from mental illness. This reflects the statements of the prosecutor in the case, as well as a psychologist who testified that Lane has “mental illness of psychotic proportions.” You can read more about that here. Lane’s lawyers have been silent under a gag order, but have not disputed expert testimony that suggests Lane is mentally ill and suffers through periods of psychosis.

Furthermore, in Ohio criminal cases, there are generally two stages where mental illness can be applied.

·         The first is before trial, if an individual is so unwell he cannot aid with his own defense. A judge can commit someone to treatment to try to get them to the point of understanding the proceedings, and then they can be tried.

·         Ohio also allows a defense of “not guilty by reason of insanity” in a trial, which basically says the person’s mental illness was so severe, they could not tell right from wrong when they committed the crime.  That is what’s called an “affirmative defense,” in which the burden of proof is on defense attorneys, rather than prosecutors.

Comments

  • Marva L. Stith

    My thinking mirrors the information explored in this essay. Bullying has happened through the ages and in every stage of life. It happens in school, at work, during careers, in meetings. The antagonized individual has a role to manage also. It can be done peacefully and with a smile. It is naturally easier to handle right situations than it is to handle wrong situations. So we must not ignore teaching youngsters how to do that; how to hold their heads high – while not ignoring the perpetrator.

  • disgusted

    Really? This is a new low. I expected better from an affiliate of NPR. Bullies 2 Buddies tells kids NOT to talk to adults when they are being disrespected by others because it is “part of growing up” because “we are animals.” This is the philosophy you are promoting? Bullying is LEARNED behavior and is condoned when others don’t step in to correct it. It is NOT the FAULT of those targeted and it is NOT the responsibility of the targeted individual to learn how to deal with it. A civil society does not tolerate disrespectful, hurtful behavior toward others. Geez, I’m not religious, but what would Jesus say??? What is wrong with people???? Thanks for taking the moment that we had to acknowledge that bullying exists and hurts and giving credence to the other side that argues that victims are at fault.

  • Philip Brett

    I’m sorry, I left two posts at another site which apparently didn’t make it to this site. In brief, the ASPF should not be regarded as an authority on the subject of suicide. The Suicide Prevention Resource Center is a much better resource for information on suicide. At the website http://www.sprc.org/sites/sprc.org/files/library/Suicide_Bullying_Issue_Brief.pdf it provides a concise summary of some of the research linking bullying and suicide including research that shows both perpetrator and victims of bullying are at higher risk of suicide than the rest of the population at large. The website provides data that show that reports of injury as a result of bullying are significantly higher than the 4% mentioned in your article regarding people who say they fear suffering injury from bullying. Data suggest that those 4% are probably right and that a lot more people should be afraid of suffering injury. The SPRC also has another useful link on the “safe” reporting of suicide at http://www.suicidology.org/c/document_library/get_file?folderId=231&name=DLFE-70.pdf which recommends, among other suggestions, not using the phrase “committed suicide” when reporting on someone who suicides or dies from suicide. And, yes, research shows that the manner in which suicide is reported can actually increase the instances of suicide. Programs that put the onus for addressing the bullying problem on the victims are different from programs that punish victims only in a matter of degree.

About StateImpact

StateImpact seeks to inform and engage local communities with broadcast and online news focused on how state government decisions affect your lives.
Learn More »

Education