Ohio

Eye on Education

Data: Comparing Reading Performance in Ohio to Florida in Third Grade Reading Guarantee Debate

Bart / Flickr

Some Ohio policy makers want Ohio to follow Florida's lead on third grade reading.

On Monday at 9 a.m., our partners at WCPN’s Sound of Ideas take on the issue of the third grade reading guarantee and how that policy has played out in Florida. (Listen online here.)

For nearly ten years now, Florida has required third graders to score above a certain level on the state reading test in order to move on to the fourth grade.

Our partners at StateImpact Florida say that when the third grade reading requirement took effect in 2003, it caused an uproar:

More than 30 percent of Florida’s third graders were at risk of being held back.

But:

Within two years the number of third graders at risk of being held back was cut in half. The rate remained constant until this year, when the state raised the requirements to pass.

And Florida’s scores on the National Assessment of Educational Progress have improved faster than the national average.

Since the state approved the third grade reading requirement in 2002, fourth grade NAEP reading scores have increased by 11 points — the equivalent of a year’s worth of improvement. Florida scores now exceed the national average.

So how does Florida compare to Ohio?

  • Looking at the percentage of all fourth graders who are proficient in reading, Florida was significantly behind both Ohio and the nation in 2002.
  • By 2011, Florida had caught up to — but not outperformed — Ohio and the nation.
  • Over the same period, the percentage of Ohio fourth graders proficient in reading didn’t change significantly.

Percent of Fourth Graders Proficient in Reading

2002 2011 Difference from 2002
National public 30 32 Higher
Florida 27 35 Higher
Ohio 34 34 No significant difference
Difference among jurisdictions Ohio > national public and Florida No significant difference

Source: National Assessment of Educational Progress. Because the NAEP is conducted using a sample of schools, small differences in the percentage of student at or above the “proficient” level are not necessarily significant. We have noted the significant differences between years and between Ohio and other juridictions in these charts.

Florida officials also say that their third grade reading guarantee policy had led to even greater improvements in how many low-income and non-white fourth graders are proficient in reading.  When we compare the performance of low-income fourth graders (those eligible for free/reduced-price lunch) to non-low income fourth graders in Florida and Ohio, Florida also comes out ahead.

  • A greater percentage of low-income Florida fourth graders were proficient in reading in 2011 than in 2002. In Ohio, that figure didn’t change significantly.
  • In 2002, Ohio and Florida were roughly on par in terms of the percentage of low-income fourth graders proficient in reading. By 2011, Florida had surpassed Ohio.
  • But, like many other states, the performance of Florida’s non-low income students improved significantly more than the performance of low-income students.

Percent of Low-Income Fourth Graders Proficient in Reading

2002 2011 Difference from 2002
National public 16 18 Higher
Florida 18 24 Higher
Ohio 18 19 No significant difference
Difference among jurisdictions No significant difference Florida > Ohio and national public

Source: National Assessment of Educational Progress

Percent of Non-low-Income Fourth Graders Proficient in Reading

2002 2011 Difference from 2002
National public 41 48 Higher
Florida 39 53 Higher
Ohio 42 47 No significant difference
Difference among jurisdictions No significant difference Florida > Ohio and national public

Source: National Assessment of Educational Progress

Here’s the obvious catch: It’s not clear that holding back third graders who can’t read was the sole reason for its improvements. In fact, even those pushing Ohio to follow Florida’s lead aren’t saying that a third grade reading guarantee on its own is a magic bullet. They say things like funding tied to student success and policies like a school grading system that heavily weights much the bottom tier of students improve have also led to Florida’s improved educational performance.

And according to the non-partisan Education Commission of the States, the states and school districts that have seen the most success in requiring students to pass a reading test to advance to the next grade level generally pair that requirement with close monitoring of small class sizes and intensive, personalized help.

But the commission does say that retention policies may generate “a sense of urgency for improving early reading proficiency, similar improvements in student achievement might well be achieved through identification and intervention — without the need for retention.”

 

Comments

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Pam-Tignor/100003735748192 Pam Tignor

    Why do Ohio’s reading scores show no gain?? Thats the magical question! You only have to look as far as the reading method, and that is WHOLE WORD!! There is the answer to that question!! And why is that method STILL being used?? Money backers,,National Reading Association.. They are keeping that worthless reading method in our schools and robbing our children of their ability to read! It’s all so very simple!

    We learn to read by sound not sight..That sight method is the ONLY reason why so many children are not reading!! Balanaced Literacy is what they are calling it now…. Lip service to phonics. It is still whole word only under a new name.. Are we so blind that we cannot see that? I’m a mom without a degree and I see it!

    Until that worthless sight reading method is out of our schools, our childrens reading scores will continue to decline!! Wake up parents!!! Explicit systematic phonics will teach your children to read!!!!

About StateImpact

StateImpact seeks to inform and engage local communities with broadcast and online news focused on how state government decisions affect your lives.
Learn More »

Education