Idaho

Bringing the Economy Home

Here’s What You Need To Know As Idaho’s Personal Property Tax Debate Heats Up

Georges Gobet/AFP/Getty Images / Fred Dufour/AFP

A harvesting combine, which is considered personal property, is tax-exempt in Idaho. A restaurant's wine glasses, on the other hand, are taxable personal property.

The personal property tax is shaping up to be one of the key issues of the 2013 legislative session.  For years, the Idaho Association of Commerce and Industry has lobbied for the tax to be repealed or phased out.  Lawmakers and Gov. C.L. “Butch” Otter appear to have decided that this is the year to get down to brass tacks.  Counties and cities are pushing back.

The governor summarized the main questions about getting rid of the personal property tax in an appearance at the Associated Taxpayers of Idaho conference this week.  “What is the process that we should use?” he asked.  “Should we take a multiple year approach to it?  Should we replace the funds, and if so, how?  Where is that revenue stream going to come from?”

If those questions leave you baffled, read on.  This is your guide to the personal property tax in Idaho.

What is the personal property tax?

Local taxing districts collect taxes on both real and personal property.  Real property is, more or less, real estate.  It’s the big, immovable stuff, like land and homes and buildings.

Personal property, on the other hand, describes the smaller, tangible things we all own.  It’s your furniture, your clothing, your bicycle.  Idaho’s personal property tax only applies to personal property used for business purposes.  A state tax commission guide describes it this way:

Taxable personal property consists of items used commercially, such as furniture, libraries, art, coin collections, machinery, tools, equipment, signs, unregistered vehicles, and watercraft. Taxable personal property also includes items used commercially for convenience, decoration, service, or storage. Examples are store counters, display racks, desks, chairs, file cabinets, computers, typewriters, office machines, and medical/scientific instruments.

Complicating that, Idaho has exempted certain categories of commercially used personal property from taxation.  For example, machinery and equipment used strictly for agricultural purposes are exempt.  The personal property tax also does not apply to livestock, business inventory, and certain hospitals’ medical equipment, among other things.  What’s more, the definition of taxable personal property can vary somewhat from county to county.

How much money does personal property tax bring in?

There are three main sources of tax revenue in Idaho: income, sales and property taxes.  There are also more than a dozen smaller tax categories, such as the state’s cigarette, beer and wine taxes.  Nearly all property tax revenue collected in Idaho is collected and spent by local governments.

Together, Idaho’s income, sales and additional tax revenue totaled more than $3.26 billion in the 2012 fiscal year (which ran from July 2011 through June 2012).  Property tax revenue totaled $1.43 billion in the 2012 calendar year.  With a little math, we can gather that revenue from property taxes comprises about 30 percent of the total tax revenue collected by state and local government.

Where do personal property tax collections fit into that total tax revenue picture?  In 2012, revenue from the personal property tax totaled $141 million, according to the Idaho State Tax Commission.  That means about 10 percent of property tax revenue comes from the personal property tax.  That’s about 3 percent of total tax revenue collected in Idaho.

Personal property tax revenue can be considered as a portion of the state and local tax revenue pie.  It can also be considered in the context of state spending on key public services.

For example, the $143 to $153 million in personal property tax revenue collected this year dwarfs the magnitude of the controversial cut in Medicaid funding authorized by the Idaho Legislature in 2011.  That cut saved the state $35 million in ongoing general fund revenue.  About $1.5 million dollars of that funding was restored in 2012.

Why get rid of the personal property tax?

The Idaho Association of Commerce and Industry (IACI) is the most prominent opposition to the personal property tax in Idaho.  The association’s argument centers on the impracticalities of the tax. “It is one of the most difficult to administer and comply with for government and business alike,” reads IACI’s introduction to the personal property tax.

The association maintains that getting rid of the personal property tax will result in economic growth.  “It is a barrier to economic development,” IACI’s statement about the tax continues, “and studies indicate that the elimination of the tax not only benefits business, but will increase the personal income of Idaho citizens.”

Many lawmakers and others who favor doing away with the personal property tax say the tax is unfair because it is unevenly applied.  They also note that businesses wind up paying two taxes — sales tax, which goes to state coffers, and personal property tax, which is collected and spent locally — on many of the items businesses use, day to day.

Why abolishing the personal property tax is controversial

There are a lot of reasons why doing away with a particular revenue source might produce consternation.  Getting rid of the personal property tax directly affects Idaho’s taxing districts — there are 1,105 of them, and 964 levied property tax in 2012 — by taking away one of their sources of income.

Property tax revenue, on the whole, made up about a quarter of local government general revenue in 2010.  That average masks a great deal of variation across local taxing districts with respect to personal property tax collections.  Some taxing districts rely heavily on personal property tax revenue, while others take in very little.  The amount depends on the kind of industry that exists within a district.

Cities and counties have proven to be the most codified opposition to repealing or phasing out the personal property tax.  They claim that, without personal property tax revenue, they will struggle to meet their statutory and constitutional responsibilities.  “Eliminating the business personal property tax without providing replacement funding will shake the foundation of our local communities,” reads a pamphlet created by the Idaho Association of Counties.

Some lawmakers argue that the personal property tax repeal will come about through a tax shift.  In other words, they say the dollars lost by local taxing districts will have to be replaced with dollars from some other revenue source, such as a reimbursement from state coffers.

However, Sen. Brent Hill (R-Rexburg) this summer circulated a letter to local leaders suggesting otherwise.  The letter indicates that one proposal under consideration would not reimburse local governments for lost revenue, if the personal property tax is repealed.  Hill’s letter indicates that plan would also prohibit local governments from raising levy rates on real property in order to make up the lost tax dollars.

Idaho would be in the minority of states if it were to abolish the personal property tax, according to research conducted by the Idaho State Tax Commission.  That research finds that 14 states have done away with the personal property tax, or are in the process of doing so.

Comments

  • http://www.paulsidahohomes.com/ Idaho Realtor

    I can see the conundrum in this. I see the upsides too. As you see many states become tax laden and weighed down in social programs, their residents will gravitate to states that are more fiscally responsible and secondly more tax friendly. Idaho has lent itself as one of those states for many that move here to raise a family and/or retire.

  • ProudIdahoan

    There is a common-sense compromise!

    A complete repeal of the business equipment tax would be devastating to schools, towns, and counties, while shifting these taxes to home property taxes (and some small businesses will pay more as well). Some hard-hit school districts would need property taxes to double to maintain their budges (which have already been cut 20% in the past few years). This makes housing more expensive for regular Idahoans and is especially hard for those on fixed incomes.

    If we give small businesses a break by exempting $100,000 in equipment, 90% of businesses in Idaho will no longer have to worry about this tax, while we’ll preserve most of the critical dollars for our schools and life-saving services (police, fire, emergency assistance). Idaho would lose ~$20 million instead of $140-$150 million if we give small businesses a break and ask big businesses to keep paying their fair share.

    Most of the critical revenue that the tax brings in comes from the biggest 10% of Idaho businesses. Some of these are out-of-state corporations that pay nothing or little in state income taxes, even when they have billions of dollars in profits. So, property taxes are the way these businesses contribute to Idaho.

    If corporations and families keep working together we can prevent further damage to our schools and make sure our public safety, transportation, and emergency assistance services stay strong.

About StateImpact

StateImpact seeks to inform and engage local communities with broadcast and online news focused on how state government decisions affect your lives.
Learn More »

Economy
Education